Unit 5: Resolving Conflictive Claims for Justice: Revisiting the Individual-Collective Debate
Among the myriad of issues of applied global justice are questions that pertain to conflicting claims of fairness. Having explored empowerment, agency, and distributive justice in the previous unit, this unit turns to an analysis of global justice and resolving conflictive claims. Specifically, how might you apply the theoretical material to situations that arise when various individuals, groups, or communities make apparently competing claims for justice?
While particular societies may have conflict resolution mechanisms to mete out justice, are there parallel effective mechanisms when the discussion shifts to global justice? Of singular significance are two scenarios: conflicts between individuals' claims of justice vs. those claims of a community and conflictive claims made by different communities. Such questions are examined in two specific contexts: gender/sexuality and race/ethnicity. For the former context, this unit will focus on female genital mutilation (FGM) and sexual orientation; for the latter context, this unit will discuss self-determination and genocide.
Completing this unit should take you approximately 8 hours.
5.1: Individuals, Communities, and the Pursuit of Justice
5.2: Individuals and Justice
5.2.1: Gender and Sexuality: Female Genital Mutilation
5.2.2: Gender and Sexuality: Sexual Orientation
5.2.3: Race, Ethnicity, and Indigeneity: The Identity Bridge between Individuals and Communities
5.3: Communities and Justice
5.3.1: Self-determination and Sovereignty
Unit 5 Current Events Exercise