Unit 2: Theoretical Frameworks for Ethical Analysis
In this unit, we examine classical and contemporary theories of ethics, and the frameworks decision makers use to resolve ethical dilemmas. Five primary frameworks include: virtue ethics (Aristotle), Deontology (Immanuel Kant), Utilitarianism and the common good (John Stuart Mill), The Golden Rule, and the Fairness approach (Rawls). Each framework aims to identify problems, gather facts, and assess solutions, but the method for assessing the viability of available solutions differs.
While policy makers prefer certain approaches to problem solving, one approach may not be appropriate or feasible for all of the dilemmas they face. They need to know how to apply a variety of approaches to a given situation.
Completing this unit should take you approximately 5 hours.
Upon successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
- identify key ethicists and the theories of their works;
- explain several frameworks for ethical decision making;
- discuss the application of ethical frameworks to government policymaking;
- apply various ethical frameworks to your own decision making; and
- discuss the pros and cons of popular ethical frameworks.
2.1: Ethical Decision-Making Frameworks
There is no one agreed upon standard for ethics. Different people adopt different ethical frameworks that guide their decision making. It is important to know something about a few of the most influential frameworks to understand how politics has evolved, nationally and internationally, throughout the centuries. These frameworks are ways of approaching decision making and looking at the world. They do not provide specific answers, but color how someone will come to an answer.
Moral foundations theory is a way of understanding the way ethics works in the day-to-day world. Watch this video which introduces this theory.
Read this chapter which helps match broad principles with examples of decision-making, where applying the principles may be tougher than it first seems.
2.2: Virtue Ethics
Plato (c. 423–348 BC) and Aristotle (384–322 BC), the Greek philosophers, examined what it means to live virtuously, or in ways that will promote human flourishing (eudaimonia) or living a good life. These thinkers provided the foundation for what we call virtue ethics.
Aristotle considered courage, justice, temperance, and wisdom the most important virtues. Likewise, cultivating one's character involves learning to avoid the opposing vices: cowardice (or brashness), injustice, intemperance, and ignorance. These theories about virtue focus on the development and state of one's character. So, rather than simply learn moral rules, the virtue theorist focuses on learning to become a moral person, to develop a virtuous character.
Re-read this article we explored in Unit 1 which also summarizes Aristotle's notion of the good.
Some describe Aristotle's concept of virtue as the "golden mean." The virtuous person "hits the mark," by knowing what to do, when to do it, where to do it, how to do it, why it is done, and to whom it is done. This is no easy feat – the bullseye is hard to hit. It takes practice. Read this article which discusses the Golden Mean.
2.3: Deontology
Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), the German philosopher, believed that issues of morality depend on our intentions rather than the consequences of our actions. Even if we are completely ineffective in our efforts to do good, the good will is praiseworthy in itself. In other words, our intention is more important than the outcome. Kant uses the word, maxim, to identify the intentions or principles we use to guide our actions. For example, "Always put others first" or "Do whatever it takes to get ahead." People follow maxims to help them choose an appropriate action or response.
We derive the term, deontology from the Greek word for duty, deos. Deontological ethics is based on duty. Since Kant based his ethics solely in the concept of duty, or "doing the right thing", rather than consequences, his ethical theory provides the main foundation of deontological ethics.
Kant's categorical imperative is about acting according to the right maxims. The morally-correct maxims are those which accord with our duty, rather than our inclinations. Kant ultimately claims that an action is morally correct, not only if it aligns with our duty, but if we do it for the sake of duty.
Watch this lecture which offers an overview of Kant's ethics, the most well known deontological ethical theory.
The categorical imperative is the formal articulation of our duty, a universal obligation. In other words, it is what we must do (or refrain from doing) in all circumstances. Kant provides four formulations of the categorical imperative:
- Act only on that maxim (rule for acting) that you can will at the same time to become a universal law.
- Never act in such a way as to treat humanity (oneself included) as a mere means, but also always an end in itself.
- Act so that, through your maxims (rules for acting), you could be a legislator of universal laws.
- Act in accordance with the maxims of a member giving universal laws for a merely possible kingdom of ends.
Watch this video which describes the categorical imperative and why Kant thinks it is important.
Our duty is obligatory, necessitates our action, and is something we must do. How do we know what our duty is? Read this article to further explore Kant's concept of duty. It discusses how human beings can choose to be vicious or virtuous due to free will and the ability to choose your actions.
2.4: The Utilitarian Approach
Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832), the English philosopher, was the first major philosopher to espouse the principle of utility and utilitarianism. He examined the moral consequences of our actions in addition to the intrinsic quality of the act.
Bentham believed that the right thing to do, individually and collectively, is to maximize the balance of pleasure over pain, and happiness over suffering, to promote the greatest good for the greatest number. He stated that it is preferable to act in ways that uphold "the greatest benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness ... to prevent the happening of mischief, pain, evil, or unhappiness."
John Stuart Mill (1806–1873), also an English philosopher, and Jeremy Bentham were both utilitarians, but they had different ideas about the specifics of utilitarianism. We could describe Bentham as a hedonistic utilitarian, and John Stuart Mill as an idealistic utilitarian, because Mill believed some pleasures are higher and more ethical than others.
Watch this video lecture on distributive justice, an idea that fairness is based on who gets what, and when and why they get it. Think about resources such as money, land, and healthcare being doled out according to what would provide the largest benefit to the highest number of people.
Utilitarian ethics argues that the "greatest good for the greatest number" should be prioritized over all other ethical concerns. This ethical scheme has been influential in the democratic world and appeals to many people today. Read this overview to better understand contemporary political debates.