• Unit 1: Negotiation Strategy

    Negotiation (or bargaining) occurs in various contexts. While this course focuses on business negotiations, we can apply negotiation principles to various personal, business, organizational, and public situations.

    For example, you may need to buy or rent a new home or negotiate the terms of a new work assignment. Your work supervisor may ask you to draft a new purchasing contract with a vendor, establish project deadlines with your team, or broker a merger between two corporations. In the public sector, you may meet with the mayor to review a school board policy, write language for a legislative bill, or discuss the terms of a new international trade agreement.

    "Successful bargaining means looking for positives in every possible circumstance", states the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Your strategy may be economic, political, social, or international, depending on whether you are a small business or a multinational corporation. Knowing your motivations and those of your counterparts will help guide an appropriate, realistic plan. Understanding the principles, strategies, and tactics negotiators use will help you draw a confident roadmap.

    In this unit, we explore various biases that affect our decision-making and how we can use this knowledge to overcome obstacles to clear, objective, and effective negotiations. In subsequent units, we study how to apply these concepts to specific negotiation theories to add or create value for all negotiation participants.

    Completing this unit should take you approximately 6 hours.

    • 1.1: What Is Negotiation?

      Negotiation has various definitions but generally involves getting people to agree to certain concepts to follow the same rules of engagement. Governments and large businesses often train their leaders and operational managers to be better negotiators due to the effect it can have on their bottom line.

      They also want to ensure they work from the same script with the same goals.

    • 1.2: Problem-Solving

      Negotiation theories are rooted in decision-making analysis. In one theory, decisions are structural and relate to how to navigate a process or procedure. Other theories resemble barter systems or basic trade concepts. There are many ways to achieve your goal.

      Problem-solving goes hand-in-hand with negotiation and conflict resolution because it involves choosing the best strategy for reaching a certain goal. Stakeholders begin by identifying a final goal and deciding the steps they need to take to get there. The discussion should present alternative options that achieve an acceptable resolution.

    • 1.3: Establishing SMART Goals

      Negotiations can involve teams, researchers, marketing agencies, and community organizations. The complexity depends on the magnitude or importance of the goal. Recall the five phases of negotiation. Although the presentation stage receives the most attention, each phase can affect the negotiation outcome.

    • 1.4: Creating a Clear Strategy

      The desired outcome from your negotiation should drive the four basic strategies you follow. You should ask two questions before any negotiation: How important is the negotiation outcome to you, your team, or your business? How important is your long-term relationship with the other person?

      Make sure you have planned your strategy with your team before your negotiation so everyone is on the same page and makes similar demands. For example, your outcome could be the price of the item. What is the highest price you are willing to pay? How important are quality and customer service? Are you willing to pay more for these attributes? What actions do you expect the person you are meeting with to perform? Clear communication is critical so neither side is disappointed when the item is delivered due to a misunderstanding about the terms of your agreement.
      Do you want to create a long-term relationship with the other party? You might want to adjust your outcome if you do. For example, you might pay a higher price, throw in additional services, or make concessions to foster goodwill and please them.

    • 1.5: Distributive Negotiation (Win-Lose)

      Distributive negotiation is a common way to look at negotiation because it involves a fixed object or item two or more parties want. Since the object or item is set (many use the analogy of the pieces of a pie), each party enters a negotiation as they try to get more for their side. One party gets more pie, and the other gets less: a win-lose outcome. You can extend this analogy to any negotiation, such as a buyer and seller negotiating a price, a store purchasing produce or other supplies, a non-profit organization applying for a grant, or a salary negotiation with your employer.

    • 1.6: Integrative Negotation (Win-Win)

      In a distributive negotiation, the pieces of the pie are known and finite. Each side tries to get more of the pie to win. However, the distributive mindset may prompt negotiators to miss opportunities to "expand the pie". Some negotiators adopt an integrative approach where they look for ways to collaborate so everyone wins. For example, buyers and sellers can launch new initiatives, products, or programs with shared values or interests.

    • Unit 1 Assessment

      • Receive a grade