Distribution Systems in Omni-Channel Retailing
Introduction
The share of online sales in retail is growing
globally. It is driven by an
increase in sales in existing online channels, as well as by the ongoing
market entry of bricks-and-mortar retailers into e-commerce. As
retailing develops towards a seamless omni-channel (OC) shopping
experience, the distinctions between physical bricks-and-mortar stores
and webshops will vanish. This OC revolution
was triggered by the recent reaction of bricks-and-mortar retailers to
the new service offers from pure online retailers. The majority of bricks-and-mortar retailers, therefore, now serve
customers via multiple sales channels. Additionally, distance
retailers, such as pure online players, are establishing physical stores
to expand their service offerings.
The
growing number of channels also increases complexity from a logistics
point of view. The fulfillment process is no
longer linear, because bricks-and-mortar retailing is increasingly
overlapping with distance retail. Before, supply
chain management was responsible for delivering goods to a retail store.
The store was the end point of the transaction. Online retailing has now placed distribution systems on the front
line, since retailers need to offer a variety of options for finding,
buying, and returning goods across bricks-and-mortar stores and webshop. Bricks-and-mortar stores today
are only one of a set of channels. With this new set of channels,
retailers must simultaneously accommodate and anticipate demand and
ensure availability, meet varying lead-times, and keep costs down for
each channel.
Essen and Leeuw show
in their global report of 1000 webshops that product flows and
logistics systems are not yet fully linked across channels. For example,
less than 40 % of webshops that belong to a retailer with
bricks-and-mortar stores offer the possibility of returning orders to
the store. Similarly, store pickup of online orders is not provided by
about 70 % of the retailers with multiple channels. These relatively low
shares of cross-channel connections may not be surprising, as even the
simplest form of cross-channel fulfillment leads to multiple challenges.
For example, if a retailer offers buy online and pick-up in-store, it
needs answers to questions such as where inventory will come from and
will the products be picked in-store, in an e-commerce distribution
center (DC) or in a bricks-and-mortar DC. Retailers rapidly find
themselves descending into the midst of a strategic review of their
entire supply chain network. Moreover,
customers demand perfect order fulfillment and are unwilling to listen
to excuses. This requires "real-time, channel
agnostic visibility" across the distribution systems. It is
not surprising, therefore, that four of five retailers believe their
supply chain does not fit the purpose of OC retailing, and requires
re-engineering of its physical product flows.
This
requires OC retailers to set up connected physical flows of goods and
operational structures across channels without sacrificing their
business model due to growing complexity. Thereby retailers are
increasingly facing the challenge of re-engineering their processes to
enable seamless logistics across all channels. The Vice President SCM of
an electronic retailer formulates this in the following way:
"Some rules of the game we had to learn in bricks-and-mortar business
do no longer apply with the advent of e-business. We can no longer think
in the bricks-and-mortar business model".
To complicate matters,
return logistics capabilities must be built up to manage the relevant
volume of returns, because most online customers demand an easy and
convenient way for returning their products. All
this requires distribution systems for forward and backward processes
that serve customers in stores and simultaneously offer personal
deliveries, e.g., store pickup and home deliveries, as well as in-store
return of online orders. Integration across channels is changing and the
challenge is to implement it in the most effective and efficient way,
rather than deciding whether or not to do it.
Due to these recent and ongoing
transformational challenges, retail research and practice lack a
structured view of the design options for OC distribution systems,
because delivery and return options, and customer preferences are
evolving over time. In particular, the field requires the generic
systematization of goods distribution within multiple retail channels.
This
includes an analysis of operational challenges, service impacts,
contextual factors, and application areas for OC forward distribution
and return concepts developed in retail practice. Practitioners are
seeking guidance on how to merge these structures. Kozlenkova et al. conclude from a literature review that multiple channel research
is needed to optimize the system of different distribution
configurations.
This paper, therefore, lays the groundwork for OC
distribution systems and extends the literature, because it is the
first study to provide a comprehensive perspective on OC distribution
based on empirical data. The term "comprehensive" in our context refers
to an overall perspective of the major OC retail sectors and all the
subsystems in forward and backward distribution. We discuss the
advancements in and the advantages and requirements of these concepts.
Theoretical insight is gained from demonstrating how the addition of a
new distribution channel can alter our understanding of retail logistics
management.
To streamline distribution issues, we focus on
non-food distribution, which differs fundamentally from food
distribution in terms of its requirements. Nowadays non-food is
still the main sector for OC concepts. Non-food
distribution is characterized by made-to-stock and non-perishable items
that can be shipped regardless of freshness and temperature constraints.
Non-food home delivery in Europe is usually fulfilled by carrier,
express, and parcel providers (CEP), and without customers having to be
at home. As online retailing also displays
country-specific patterns and shopping behavior and because of the
different international delivery models, we concentrate on the largest
European retail market, i.e., the German-speaking countries. This also
allows a comparison of (national) logistics systems between retailers.
The
remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Sect. 2 elaborates the
setting for OC distribution. Afterwards Sect. 3 presents an overview of
related literature and identifies the need for further research. We
then present the methodology, the research process we employed, and the
interview sample in Sect. 4. Sections 5 to 7 present the findings,
identify relevant areas, systematize and discuss OC forward distribution
and return concepts. Sections 8 and 9 summarize findings, relate them
to the literature and discuss further areas of research.