Cash Flow Analysis and Other Factors

Cash Flow Factors

Cash flow is the movement of money into or out of a business, project, or financial product. It is usually measured over a specified, finite period of time. Cash flow measurements can be used to calculate other parameters that give information on a company's value and situation.

Cash flows reflect cash entering or leaving the organization.

Statement of Cash Flow in a Business's Financial Statements

A business's Statement of Cash Flows illustrates its calculated net cash flow. The net cash flow of a company over a period (typically a quarter or a full year) is equal to the change in cash balance over this period: It's positive if the cash balance increases (more cash becomes available); it's negative if the cash balance decreases. The total net cash flow is composed of several factors:

• Operational cash flows are received or expended due to the company's internal business activities. This includes cash earnings plus changes to working capital. Over the medium term, this must be net positive if the company is to remain solvent.
  
  
• Investment cash flows are received from the sale of long-life assets or spent on capital expenditure, such as investments, acquisitions, and long-life assets.
  
  
• Financing cash flows are received from the issue of debt and equity or paid out as dividends, share repurchases, or debt repayments.

Uses

Cash flow factors can be used for calculating parameters, such as:

• To determine a project's rate of return or value. The cash flows into and out of projects are inputs in financial models, such as internal rate of return and net present value.
  
  
• To determine problems with a business's liquidity. Being profitable does not necessarily mean being liquid. Even while profitable, a company can fail because of a cash shortage.
  
  
• As an alternative measure of a business's profits when it is believed that accrual accounting concepts do not represent economic realities, for example, a company may be notionally profitable but generate little operational cash (as may be the case for a company that barters its products rather than selling for cash). In such a case, the company may derive additional operating cash by issuing shares or raising additional debt finance.
  
  
• It can be used to evaluate the "quality" of income generated by accrual accounting. When net income is composed of large non-cash items, it is considered low quality.
  
  
• To evaluate the risks within a financial product (e.g., matching cash requirements, evaluating default risk, re-investment requirements, etc.)

Cash flow is a generic term used differently depending on the context. Users may define it for their own purposes. It can refer to actual past or projected future flows, the total of all flows involved, or a subset of those flows.

Source: Boundless Finance, https://ftp.worldpossible.org/endless/eos-rachel/RACHEL/RACHEL/modules/en-boundless-static/www.boundless.com/finance/textbooks/boundless-finance-textbook/capital-budgeting-11/cash-flow-analysis-and-other-factors-95/index.html
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.

Replacement Projects

The possibility of replacement projects must be taken into account during the process of capital budgeting and subsequent project management. A replacement project is an undertaking in which the company eliminates a project at the end of its life and substitutes another investment. This replacement project can serve the purpose of replacing an expiring investment with a new, identical one or replacing an existing investment that is producing unfavorable results with one that management believes will perform better.

When analyzing a project and ultimately deciding whether it is a good investment decision, one focuses on the expected cash flows associated with the project. These cash flows form the basis for the project's value, usually after implementing a method of discounted cash flow analysis. Most projects have a finite useful life. Analysis can be undertaken to determine when the optimum point of replacement will be, as well as if replacement is a viable option in the first place. To accomplish this, one analyzes the cash flows of the current project and the expected cash flows from the replacement project.

Replacing a window sill vs. keeping the old one Replacement project analysis tells a company whether the costs of a replacement project provide a suitable return on investment.

Analysis

The net cash flows for a project take into account revenues and costs generated by the project, along with more indirect implications, such as sunk costs, opportunity costs, and depreciation costs related to the project. All of these considerations taken together allow management to consider the project's incremental cash flows, which are inflows and outflows the project produces over predictable periods of time. Discounted cash flow analysis should be undertaken for both the existing project and the potential replacement project. These analyses can then be used to compare the expected profitability of both projects; which will, in theory, lead management to make the right decision regarding the investments.

In general, there will be some sort of cash inflow from ending the old project – for example, from the terminal value realized upon the sale of existing equipment – and a subsequent cash outflow to begin the new project. The loss of expected future cash flows from the previous project, or opportunity cost, must also be considered. A general form that can be used to analyze these cash flows is:

Increase in Net Income + (Depreciation on New Investment - Depreciation on Old Investment)

Sunk Costs

Sunk costs are retrospective costs that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Sunk costs are sometimes contrasted with prospective costs, which are future costs that may be incurred or changed if an action is taken.

Sunk costs are irrecoverable.

Impact on Investment Decision

The idea of sunk costs is often employed when analyzing business decisions. In traditional microeconomic theory, only prospective (future) costs are relevant to an investment decision. For example, the research and development of a pharmaceutical company are retrospective once it is time to market the product. Once spent, such costs are sunk and should not affect future pricing decisions. The company will charge market prices whether R&D costs one dollar or one million dollars. Therefore, the costs of R&D are considered sunk once they are retrospective and irrecoverable. At that point, they have no rational bearing on further investment decisions.

Difference from Economic Loss

The sunk cost is distinct from economic loss. For example, when a car is purchased, it can subsequently be resold; however, it will probably not be resold for the original purchase price. The economic loss is the difference between these values (including transaction costs). The sum originally paid should not affect any rational future decision-making about the car, regardless of the resale value. If the owner can derive more value from selling the car than not selling it, then it should be sold, regardless of the price paid.

In this sense, the sunk cost is not a precise quantity but an economic term for a sum paid in the past, which is no longer relevant to decisions about the future. The sunk cost may be the original cost or the expected economic loss. It may also be used as shorthand for an error in the analysis due to the sunk cost fallacy, irrational decision-making, or, most simply, irrelevant data.

Opportunity Costs

Opportunity cost is the value of any activity measured against the value of the next best alternative forgone (that is not chosen). In other words, it is the sacrifice of the second-best choice available to someone or a group that has picked among several mutually exclusive choices.

Alternative Choices: \Choosing one alternative means another is foregone.

Economic Concept

Opportunity cost is a key concept in economics; it relates the scarcity of resources to the mutually exclusive nature of choice. The notion of opportunity cost plays a crucial role in ensuring that scarce resources are allocated efficiently. Thus, opportunity costs are not restricted to monetary or financial costs: the real cost of output forgone, lost time, pleasure, or any other benefit that provides utility is also considered implicit. Or opportunity costs.

In the context of cash flow analysis, opportunity cost can be considered a cash flow that could be generated from assets the organization already owns if they are not used for the project in question. There is always a trade-off between making decisions on the allocation of assets.

Assessing Opportunity Cost

Opportunity cost is assessed not only in monetary or material terms but also in terms of anything of value to the decision-maker.

For example, a person who desires to watch each of two television programs being broadcast simultaneously but cannot record one can only watch one of the desired programs. Therefore, the opportunity cost of watching an NFL football game could be not enjoying the college football game or vice versa.

Examples

In a restaurant, the opportunity cost of eating steak could be trying the salmon. The opportunity cost of ordering both meals could be twofold: the extra $20 to buy the second meal and the diner's reputation with peers, as the diner may be considered greedy or extravagant for ordering two meals. A family might use a short vacation to visit Disneyland rather than do household improvement work. The opportunity cost of having happier children could, therefore, be a remodeled bathroom.

In a job situation, a person could either run their bakery or work as an employee for a restaurant. There are explicit costs on the line, such as the capital necessary to start a business, purchasing all the inputs, and so forth. However, there are possible implicit benefits, such as autonomy and freedom to be "your boss," and implicit costs, such as the stress of running your own business. Suppose the individual chooses to run their bakery. In that case, their opportunity costs are the salary that the restaurant would have paid and the smaller burden of responsibility as an employee instead of an owner.

Externalities

In economics, an externality is a cost or benefit that is not transmitted through prices and is incurred by a party who was not involved as either a buyer or seller of the goods or services. The cost of an externality is a negative externality or external cost, while the benefit of an externality is a positive externality or external benefit.

Pollution is an example of a negative externality.

Relation to Prices

In the case of both negative and positive externalities, prices in a competitive market do not reflect the full costs or benefits of producing or consuming a product or service. Producers and consumers may neither bear all of the costs nor reap all of the benefits of the economic activity.

Over- and Under-Production

Standard economic theory states that any voluntary exchange benefits both parties involved in the trade. This is because buyers or sellers would not trade if either thought it was not beneficial.

However, an exchange can cause additional effects on third parties. Those who suffer from external costs do so involuntarily, while those who enjoy external benefits do so at no cost. A voluntary exchange may reduce total economic benefit if external costs exist. The person affected by the negative externalities in the case of air pollution will see it as a lowered utility: either subjective displeasure or potentially explicit costs, such as higher medical expenses.

On the other hand, a positive externality would increase the utility of third parties at no cost to them. Since collective societal welfare is improved, but the providers have no way of monetizing the benefit, less of the good will be produced than would be optimal for society.

For example, manufacturing causes air pollution, which imposes costs on society, while public education benefits society. If external costs such as pollution exist, a competitive market will overproduce the good, as the producer does not consider the external costs when producing the good.

If there are external benefits, such as in areas of education, too little of the good would be produced by private markets as producers and buyers do not take into account the external benefits to others. Here, overall cost and benefit to society are defined as the sum of the economic benefits and costs for all parties involved.

"Free Rider" Problem

Positive externalities are often associated with the free rider problem. For example, vaccinated individuals reduce the risk of contracting the relevant disease for all others around them. Society may receive large health and welfare benefits at high levels of vaccination. Conversely, any one individual can refuse vaccination, still avoiding the disease by "free riding" on the costs borne by others.

Market Correction

The market-driven approach to correcting externalities is to "internalize" third-party costs and benefits, such as requiring polluters to repair any damage they cause. However, in many cases, internalizing costs or benefits is not feasible, especially if the true monetary values cannot be determined.

Tax Rate

In a tax system, the tax rate describes the ratio at which a business or person is taxed.

Tax Rate The tax rate is a percentage of the taxable base.

Methods

There are several methods used to present a tax rate:

• Statutory
• Average
• Marginal
• Effective

Statutory

A statutory tax rate is a legally imposed rate. An income tax could have multiple statutory rates for different income levels, whereas a sales tax may have a flat statutory rate.

Average

An average tax rate is the ratio of the amount of taxes paid to the tax base (taxable income or spending). To calculate the average tax rate on an income tax, divide the total tax liability by the taxable income.

Marginal

A marginal tax rate is the tax rate that applies to the last dollar of the tax base (taxable income or spending) and is often applied to the change in one's tax obligation as income rises.

This rate can be determined for an individual by increasing or decreasing the income earned or spent and calculating the change in taxes payable. An individual's tax bracket is the income range to which a given marginal tax rate applies.

The marginal tax rate may increase or decrease as income or consumption increases, although in most countries, the tax rate is progressive in principle. In such cases, the average tax rate will be lower than the marginal tax rate. For instance, an individual may have a marginal tax rate of 45% but pay an average tax of half this amount.

In a jurisdiction with a flat tax on earnings, every taxpayer pays the same percentage of income, regardless of income or consumption. Some proponents of this system propose to exempt a fixed amount of earnings (such as the first $10,000) from the flat tax.

Marginal tax rates may be published explicitly, together with the corresponding tax brackets, but they can also be derived from published tax tables showing the tax for each income. It may be calculated by noting how tax changes with changes in pre-tax income rather than with taxable income.

Effective

The term effective tax rate has significantly different meanings when used in different contexts or by different sources. Generally, it means that some amount of tax is divided by some amount of income or other tax base. In U.S. income tax law, the term is used to determine whether a foreign income tax on specific types of income exceeds a certain percentage of U.S. tax that might apply to such income.

The popular press, Congressional Budget Office, and various think tanks have used the term to refer to varying measures of tax divided by varying measures of income, with little consistency in definition. An effective tax rate may incorporate econometric, estimated, or assumed adjustments to actual data or may be based entirely on assumptions or simulations. It also incorporates tax breaks or exemptions.

Depreciation

Depreciation refers to two very different but related concepts: the decrease in value of assets (fair value depreciation), and the allocation of the cost of assets to periods in which the assets are used (depreciation with the matching principle).

Fair Value Depreciation

Fair value depreciation affects the values of businesses and entities. It is a concept used in accounting and economics, defined as a rational and unbiased estimate of the potential market price of a good, service, or asset, considering the amount at which the asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties.

Allocation of Cost with Matching Principle

Depreciated value Depreciation measures how much of an asset is used up in a certain amount of time.

The allocation of an asset's cost to periods in which it is used up affects net income. Any business or income-producing activity using tangible assets incurs costs related to those assets. In determining the net income from an activity, the receipts from the activity must be reduced by appropriate costs.

One such cost is the cost of assets used but not currently consumed in the activity. Such costs must be allocated to the period of use. Where the assets produce benefits in future periods, the matching principle of accrual accounting dictates that those costs must be deferred rather than treated as a current expense.

The business records depreciation expense as allocating such costs for financial reporting. The costs are allocated rationally and systematically as depreciation expenses for each period the asset is used, beginning when the asset is placed in service.

Generally, this involves four criteria:

1. The cost of the asset.
   
   
2. The expected salvage value, also known as the residual value of the asset.
   
   
3. The estimated useful life of the asset.
   
   
4. A method of apportioning the cost of such life.

The cost of an asset so allocated is the difference between the amount paid for it and its salvage value.

Methods

Depreciation is any method of allocating net cost to those periods expected to benefit from asset use. Generally, the cost is allocated as a depreciation expense among the periods in which the asset is expected to be used. Such expense is recognized by businesses for financial reporting and tax purposes. Methods of computing depreciation may vary by asset for the same business. Methods may be specified in the accounting or tax rules of a country. Several standard methods of computing depreciation expense may be used, including:

• fixed percentage
  
  
• straight line
  
  
• declining balance method

Depreciation expense generally begins when the asset is placed in service. For instance, a depreciation expense of $100 per year for 5 years may be recognized for an asset costing $500.

Elective Expensing

Section 179 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 179) allows a taxpayer to deduct the cost of certain types of property on their income taxes as an expense rather than requiring the cost of the property to be capitalized and depreciated. This property is generally limited to tangible, depreciable personal property acquired by purchase for use in the active conduct of a trade or business. This can afford considerable tax savings in some circumstances.

Property

Before the passage of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, buildings were not eligible for Section 179 deductions; however, qualified real property may now be deducted. Depreciable property not eligible for a Section 179 deduction is still deductible over several years through MACRS depreciation according to Sections 167 and 168.

The 179 election is optional, and the eligible property may be depreciated according to sections 167 and 168 if preferable for tax reasons. Furthermore, the 179 election may be made only for the year the equipment is placed in use and is waived if not taken for that year. However, if the election is made, it is irrevocable unless special permission is given.

Limitations

The §179 election is subject to three important limitations:

1. There is a dollar limitation. Under Section 179(b)(1), the maximum deduction a taxpayer may elect to take in a year is $500,000 in 2010 and 2011, $125,000 in 2012, and $25,000 for years beginning after 2012.
   
   
2. Suppose a taxpayer places more than $2 million worth of Section 179 property into service during a single taxable year. In that case, the 179 deduction is reduced, dollar-for-dollar, by the amount exceeding the $2 million threshold. This threshold was further reduced to $500,000 in 2012 and then $200,000 afterward.
   
   
3. Lastly, the section provides that a taxpayer's 179 deduction for any taxable year may not exceed the taxpayer's aggregate income from the active conduct of trade or business by the taxpayer for that year. If, for example, the taxpayer's net trade or business income from active conduct of trade or business was $72,500 in 2006, then the deduction cannot exceed $72,500 that year. However, any deduction not allowed in a given year under this limitation can be carried over to the next year.
   
   

Truck Expensing is applied to property used in a business, such as trucks.