Rotational Kinetic Energy

As you read, pay attention to the diagram of a spinning disk in Figure 10.15. For the disk to spin, work must be done on the disk. The force acting upon the disk must be perpendicular to the radius of the disk, which we know is torque. We also know torque is related to moment of inertia. We can relate the work done on the disk to moment of inertia using the equation  W=\tau\theta=I\alpha\theta .

Example 10.8 shows how to calculate the net work for a rotating disk using this work equation. In the second part of the example, the rotational velocity is determined using the equation for rotational acceleration and moment of inertia. Lastly, it uses this equation to calculate the rotational kinetic energy.

Example 10.8 Calculating the Work and Energy for Spinning a Grindstone

Example 10.8 Calculating the Work and Energy for Spinning a Grindstone

Consider a person who spins a large grindstone by placing her hand on its edge and exerting a force through part of a revolution as shown in Figure 10.17.

In this example, we verify that the work done by the torque she exerts equals the change in rotational energy. (a) How much work is done if she exerts a force of 200 N through a rotation of 1.00 \operatorname{rad}\left(57.3^{\circ}\right)? The force is kept perpendicular to the grindstone's 0.320-m radius at the point of application, and the effects of friction are negligible. (b) What is the final angular velocity if the grindstone has a mass of 85.0 kg? (c) What is the final rotational kinetic energy? (It should equal the work.)

Strategy

To find the work, we can use the equation \text { net } W=(\operatorname{net} \tau) \theta \text {. }. We have enough information to calculate the torque and are given the rotation angle. In the second part, we can find the final angular velocity using one of the kinematic relationships. In the last part, we can calculate the rotational kinetic energy from its expression in \mathrm{KE}_{\mathrm{rot}}=\frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}.

Solution for (a)

The net work is expressed in the equation

\text { net } W=(\text { net } \tau) \theta,

where net \tau is the applied force multiplied by the radius (r F) because there is no retarding friction, and the force is perpendicular to r. The angle \theta is given. Substituting the given values in the equation above yields

\begin{aligned} \text { net } W &=r F \theta=(0.320 \mathrm{~m})(200 \mathrm{~N})(1.00 \mathrm{rad}) \\ &=64.0 \mathrm{~N} \cdot \mathrm{m} \end{aligned}.

Noting that 1 \mathrm{~N} \cdot \mathrm{m}=1 \mathrm{~J},

\text { net } W=64.0 \mathrm{~J} \text {. }

The figure shows a large grindstone of radius r which is being given a spin by applying a force F in a counterclockwise direction, as indicated by the arrows.

Figure 10.17 A large grindstone is given a spin by a person grasping its outer edge.

Solution for (b)

To find \omega from the given information requires more than one step. We start with the kinematic relationship in the equation

\omega^{2}=\omega_{0}^{2}+2 \alpha \theta.

Note that \omega_{0}=0 because we start from rest. Taking the square root of the resulting equation gives

\omega=(2 \alpha \theta)^{1 / 2}.

Now we need to find \alpha . One possibility is

 \alpha=\frac{\text { net } \tau}{I}.

where the torque is

\text { net } \tau=r F=(0.320 \mathrm{~m})(200 \mathrm{~N})=64.0 \mathrm{~N} \cdot \mathrm{m}

The formula for the moment of inertia for a disk is found in Figure 10.12:

I=\frac{1}{2} M R^{2}=0.5(85.0 \mathrm{~kg})(0.320 \mathrm{~m})^{2}=4.352 \mathrm{~kg} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{2}.

Substituting the values of torque and moment of inertia into the expression for \alpha, we obtain

\alpha=\frac{64.0 \mathrm{~N} \cdot \mathrm{m}}{4.352 \mathrm{~kg} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{2}}=14.7 \frac{\mathrm{rad}}{\mathrm{s}^{2}}.

Now, substitute this value and the given value for \theta into the above expression for \omega:

\omega=(2 \alpha \theta)^{1 / 2}=\left[2\left(14.7 \frac{\mathrm{rad}}{\mathrm{s}^{2}}\right)(1.00 \mathrm{rad})\right]^{1 / 2}=5.42 \frac{\mathrm{rad}}{\mathrm{s}} .

Solution for (c)

The final rotational kinetic energy is

\mathrm{KE}_{\mathrm{rot}}=\frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}.

Both I and \omega were found above. Thus,

\mathrm{KE}_{\mathrm{rot}}=(0.5)\left(4.352 \mathrm{~kg} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{2}\right)(5.42 \mathrm{rad} / \mathrm{s})^{2}=64.0 \mathrm{~J} .

Discussion

The final rotational kinetic energy equals the work done by the torque, which confirms that the work done went into rotational kinetic energy. We could, in fact, have used an expression for energy instead of a kinematic relation to solve part (b). We will do this in later examples.

Helicopter pilots are quite familiar with rotational kinetic energy. They know, for example, that a point of no return will be reached if they allow their blades to slow below a critical angular velocity during flight. The blades lose lift, and it is impossible to immediately get the blades spinning fast enough to regain it.

Rotational kinetic energy must be supplied to the blades to get them to rotate faster, and enough energy cannot be supplied in time to avoid a crash. Because of weight limitations, helicopter engines are too small to supply both the energy needed for lift and to replenish the rotational kinetic energy of the blades once they have slowed down. The rotational kinetic energy is put into them before takeoff and must not be allowed to drop below this crucial level.

One possible way to avoid a crash is to use the gravitational potential energy of the helicopter to replenish the rotational kinetic energy of the blades by losing altitude and aligning the blades so that the helicopter is spun up in the descent. Of course, if the helicopter's altitude is too low, then there is insufficient time for the blade to regain lift before reaching the ground.

Problem-Solving Strategy for Rotational Energy

  1. Determine that energy or work is involved in the rotation.

  2. Determine the system of interest. A sketch usually helps.

  3. Analyze the situation to determine the types of work and energy involved.

  4. For closed systems, mechanical energy is conserved. That is, \mathrm{KE}_{\mathrm{i}}+\mathrm{PE}_{\mathrm{i}}=\mathrm{KE}_{\mathrm{f}}+\mathrm{PE}_{\mathrm{f}} . Note that  \mathrm{KE}_{\mathrm{i}}and \mathrm{KE}_{\mathrm{f}} may each include translational and rotational contributions.

  5. For open systems, mechanical energy may not be conserved, and other forms of energy (referred to previously as  (OE), such as heat transfer, may enter or leave the system. Determine what they are, and calculate them as necessary.

  6. Eliminate terms wherever possible to simplify the algebra.

  7. Check the answer to see if it is reasonable.