Hofstede's Cultural Framework

Geert Hofstede, a Dutch social psychologist, developed a widely used platform that established the dimensions of culture. Read this chapter to better understand these dimensions and see how they can be applied to different countries and cultures.

Cultural Dimension 3: Uncertainty Avoidance

Hofstede's third cultural dimension is uncertainty avoidance, the degree to which people in a society are comfortable with risk, uncertainty, and unpredictable situations. People in high uncertainty avoidance societies tend to want to avoid uncertainty and unpredictability. As a result, work environments in such countries try to provide stability and certainty through clear rules and instructions. In contrast, societies with low uncertainty avoidance are comfortable with risk, change, and unpredictability. In these countries, risky and ambiguous situations are less likely to upset people.

(Table 4) shows details of the levels of uncertainty avoidance for the selected 15 countries. We see that Anglo and Scandinavian countries have relatively lower uncertainty avoidance scores. In contrast, many emerging markets (such as Brazil, Mexico, and China) have medium to high uncertainty avoidance scores. Such findings suggest that companies should adapt their practices to conform to the levels of uncertainty avoidance. In high uncertainty avoidance countries, for example, managers are advised to provide structure and order to reduce uncertainty and ambiguity for subordinates. Companies in these cultures have many written rules and procedures that tell employees exactly what the organization expects of them. Additionally, managers should give clear and explicit directions to their subordinates about exactly what is expected of them in performing their jobs. By reducing any ambiguity, subordinates are less anxious.

In contrast, in low uncertainty avoidance countries, subordinates are much more comfortable and ambiguity. Managers can therefore give more flexibility and freedom to employees. Design of organizations also allows for fewer rules and regulations.

(Table 4) provides more detail on the implications of uncertainty avoidance on several managerial aspects.

Table 4: Implications of Uncertainty Avoidance
Type of Work Activity Low Uncertainty Avoidance High Uncertainty Avoidance
Relationship with companies
  • Weak loyalty to companies
  • Average duration of employment shorter
  • Preference for smaller organizations
  • Strong loyalty to employing organizations
  • Employment are long term in duration
  • Preference for larger companies
Characteristics of supervisors/managers
  • Superiors optimistic about subordinate ambition and leadership abilities
  • Top managers usually involved in strategy
  • Power of superiors based on relationships and position
  • Transformational leaders preferred
  • Superiors pessimistic about subordinate ambition
  • Top managers often involved in operations
  • Power of superiors based on control of uncertainties
  • Hierarchical control roles preferred
Entrepreneurship and innovation
  • Innovators feel less constrained by rules
  • Renegade championing
  • Tolerance for ambiguity in procedures and structures
  • Innovation welcomed
  • Innovators feel constrained by rules
  • Rational championing
  • Formalized management structures
  • Innovation resisted