As you read this excerpt about Nietzsche's life, consider how Nietzsche's rejection of traditional values reflected existential concerns. How is Nietzsche similar to, yet different from, the figures you have studied so far in this course?
Themes and Trends in Nietzsche's Work
Nietzsche
is important as a precursor of twentieth-century existentialism, an
inspiration for post-structuralism and an influence on postmodernism.
Nietzsche's
works helped to reinforce not only agnostic trends that followed
Enlightenment thinkers, and the biological worldview gaining currency
from the evolutionary theory of Charles Darwin (which also later found
expression in the "medical" and "instinctive" interpretations of human
behavior by Sigmund Freud), but also the "romantic nationalist"
political movements in the late nineteenth century when various peoples
of Europe began to celebrate archaeological finds and literature related
to pagan ancestors, such as the uncovered Viking burial mounds in
Scandinavia, Wagnerian interpretations of Norse mythology stemming from
the Eddas of Iceland, Italian nationalist celebrations of the glories of
a unified, pre-Christian Roman peninsula, French examination of Celtic
Gaul of the pre-Roman era, and Irish nationalist interest in
revitalizing the Irish language. Anthropological discoveries about
India, particularly by Germany, also contributed to Nietzsche's broad
religious and cultural sense.
Some
people have suggested that Fyodor Dostoevsky may have specifically
created the plot of his Crime and Punishment as a Christian rebuttal to
Nietzsche, though this cannot be correct as Dostoevsky finished Crime
and Punishment well before Nietzsche published any of his works.
Nietzsche admired Dostoevsky and read several of his works in French
translation. In an 1887 letter Nietzsche says that he read Notes from
Underground (translated 1886) first, and two years later makes reference
to a stage production of Crime and Punishment, which he calls
Dostoevsky's "main novel" insofar as it followed the internal torment of
its protagonist. In Twilight of the Idols, he calls Dostoevsky the only
psychologist from whom he had something to learn: encountering him was
"the most beautiful accident of my life, more so than even my discovery
of Stendhal."
Nietzsche and Women
Nietzsche's
comments on women are perceptibly impudent (although it is also the
case that he attacked men for their behaviors as well). However, the
women he came into contact with typically reported that he was amiable
and treated their ideas with much more respect and consideration than
they were generally acquainted with from educated men in that period of
time, amidst various sociological circumstances that continue to this
day (e.g., Feminism). Moreover, in this connection, Nietzsche was
acquainted with the work On Women by Schopenhauer and was probably
influenced by it to some degree. As such, some statements scattered
throughout his works seem forthright to attack women in a similar vein.
And, indeed, Nietzsche believed there were radical differences between
the mind of men as such and the mind of women as such. "Thus," said
Nietzsche through the mouth of his Zarathustra, "would I have man and
woman: the one fit for warfare, the other fit for giving birth; and both
fit for dancing with head and legs" (Zarathustra III. [56, "Old and New
Tables," sect. 23]) - that is to say: both are capable of doing their
share of humanity's work, with their respective physiological conditions
granted and therewith elucidating, each individually, their
potentialities. Of course, it is contentious whether Nietzsche here
adequately or accurately identifies the "potentialities" of women and
men.