Read this article. The authors propose a location selection procedure by simulating daily production volume and supply chain failures of raw materials for producing kimchi. Given the identified failures what must service-based industries consider in location selection?
Related Works
The plant location selection problem is
normally considered as a part of supply chain network design. To
minimize the total cost as well as determine an optimal flow path for a
product, previous studies have focused on demand variations, because the
quality of decisions can easily vary due to supply and demand
uncertainty, ambiguous information, and various social problems in the
global business network. It is likely that a stochastic
model, rather than a deterministic approach, can be used to express
demand uncertainty. Wang et al. used a stochastic programming model
that implies uncertain demand to find a location that maximizes business
profits. Amin and Zhang also considered the demand and return
uncertainty of a product through the stochastic programming model.
Moreover, they included environmental factors, such as the use of
eco-friendly materials and clean technology, and used the weighted sum
method as well as the ε-constraint method for multiobject optimization.
Gülpınar et al. proposed two types of demand distributions (i.e.,
normal distribution and context intended distribution) regarding
facility location in a dynamic environment. Besides that, Wagner and
Neshat applied the quantification method to assess supply chain
vulnerability. Based on the graph theory, their method of quantifying
vulnerability can be dynamically adapted, even if the supply chain is
frequently redesigned. In short, the quantification of the supply
vulnerability of a food production system must consider production
variables such as the properties of food raw materials, changes in
production quantities during different seasons, and dynamic market
changes.
In addition to fuzzy-based research, several
optimization models for supporting decision making have been proposed.
Jouzdani et al. proposed a fuzzy model that used a triangular
membership function to deal with demand uncertainty in a dairy plant.
They considered traffic congestion as an essential factor for selecting
the location because the dairy industry is very sensitive to demand
variations and the localization of the food industry usually affects
supply chain costs. Çebi and Otay proposed a fuzzy-based location
selection model for a cement plant by considering various qualitative
factors such as availability of resources, strategic factors, government
policies, and environmental factors. Mirhadi Fard et al. considered
environmental, social, and economic impacts as qualitative decision
criteria to choose a sustainable plant location. Moreover, they took
into account continuously changing geographic information in the service
region and specified spatial characteristics such as accessibility of
raw materials and proximity to the market. Rezaei and Zarandi proposed a fuzzy model for dealing with dynamic environments at the
initial location of a plant. They also developed a simulation model to
recognize any changes in the service region. Moreover, applying seasonal
parameters is one solution for ensuring the reliability of a decision
model for plant location. Ozgen and Gulsun used triangular
possibility distribution (a fundamental part of the possibility theory)
to deal with supply and demand uncertainty, along with climate as a
seasonal parameter. More specifically, they combined the possibility
distribution with the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to
handle both the quantitative and qualitative factors in the
decision-making process. However, it is difficult to decide the shape of
a membership function for representing the aggregation of data set in
fuzzy-based decision-making model; hence the specialist interviews are
usually required. Fuzzy TOPSIS approaches have been proposed for
selecting a plant location by linguistically evaluating the following
criteria: availability of skilled workers, expansion possibility,
availability of acquirement material, and investment cost. Aqlan
and Lam proposed a fuzzy-based method for supply chain risk
assessment and quantified aggregate information, such as expert
knowledge, historical data, and supply chain structure, to identify
potential risks. Deb and Bhattacharyya proposed a distinct decision
support system that uses a multifactor fuzzy inference system for
facility layout planning. Dweiri and Meier also applied fuzzy
decision making to facility layout planning and used the distance
between departments and their relationships for scoring the planned
layout.
Askin et al. proposed a genetic algorithm-based
method for warehouse location selection and determined the best capacity
design for the selected warehouse. They also set the objective function
to minimize costs due to demand variations, after which the optimal
economic order quantity was derived to continuously adapt to the
volatile inventory levels. However, metaheuristic optimization methods
such as genetic algorithm-based optimization sometimes require a lot of
time to find the optimal solution. Novaes et al. used the Voronoi
diagram, useful for conducting spatial analysis, to divide an urban
region into service districts. It is important to note that the process
parameters of a production system, which determine the productivity of a
plant, help decision makers improve the quality of their decision
regarding location selection. In this regard, Silva and De La Figuera proposed the integrated approach to find the best plant location
using both a stochastic model of a manufacturing system and a
deterministic location model. Their study examines the arrival time of
customers as well as the processing time and capacity planning of the
manufacturing system. Gebennini et al. considered production lead
time and delayed quantities of a product to determine demand variations
and supply uncertainty. Consequently, in order to make more accurate
decisions, various uncertain environmental factors need to be assessed
by the appropriate quantification methods.
Vulnerability
assessments usually underpin supply chain management due to the
quantification of uncertain disturbances for mitigating risk.
Albino et al. proposed a quantification method to measure the
vulnerability of a production system within a multisupplier network and
evaluate critical aspects using two factors, i.e., process uncertainty
and product mix variability. Petrovic et al. developed the supply
chain simulator to analyze the dynamic behaviour of a serial supply
chain in an uncertain environment. For this purpose, they proposed
discrete fuzzy sets for modeling uncertain situations in customer demand
and external supply to determine the negative effects. Vorst et al. identified sources of uncertainty (e.g., decision process time,
order lead time, and order sales period) to improve supply chain
performance and validated the trends predicted by the simulation model.
Vlajic et al. proposed an integrated framework for guiding food
companies, in which supply chain robustness was defined to identify
various disturbances through the classified sources of supply chain
vulnerability, including external and internal sources that are either
controllable or uncontrollable. However, their research mainly focused
on internal sources of vulnerability to design robust food supply
chains.
In the food industry, since fresh products have a limited
shelf life, it is particularly difficult to have many goods in stock at
all times. Thus, supply chain management and production planning
for fresh products should be carefully conducted when the inventory
levels are low. It is important to note that the supply failure
of raw materials caused by inaccurate demand predictions and tardiness
of finished (or semifinished) products are major factors that trigger
vulnerability, which can ultimately disrupt production. Furthermore, as
the food industry becomes more globalized, the importance of optimal
supply chain management has increasingly been emphasised.
Previous
studies have seldom considered an integrated approach for selecting the
best plant location using both stochastic simulation and vulnerability
quantification, even though many studies have addressed simulation-based
optimal layout design. Further, most of the studies considered the
supply of raw materials to be relatively stable. Therefore, this study
proposes an integrated approach that combines a supply vulnerability
analysis and statistical simulation to deal with various uncertain
factors (e.g., unstable supply of food raw materials) during plant
location selection.