e-Commerce and Supply Chain Management in China

Read this article. The authors provide a broad view of decisions on supply chain management concerning e-commerce in China, considering several factors, including consumer access to the internet and telecommunication infrastructure for a given location. Two case studies are included to evaluate the models included in the article. Pay particular attention to the intersection of IT and non-IT considerations for firm supply-chain management strategies.

E-commerce enterprise development in the prominent regions of China

According to Digital analytics firm eMarketer, an improving export business, higher employment and wages as well as rising e-commerce and cross-border sales across Asia-Pacific, North America and Western Europe were all factors in driving retail spending. Thus, the location of omnichannel shoppers is determined by multi-criteria that support online and offline trade development. The factors for such decisions are mainly related to the economic benefits of both enterprises and mentioned in earlier research (Panova and Hilmola, 2018): (1) National economic; (2) Industrial; (3) Logistical; (4) Economical; and (5) Regulative.

Many sub-factors influence the location decision. Their relevance depends on the scope of the location problems (whether it is viewed from international, national, statewide or communitywide level). From the international level, factors such as the access to the natural resources, provision of labour forces, foreign exchange rate, business climate, components of the multiplier effect, inflation level, duties and taxes are essential. If the scope of location problem is narrower, then the factors like property tax incentive, government regulations, transport tariffs, the selling price of goods, and business climate on local basis play a role. Authors stress that the development of technical infrastructure and regulatory frameworks stimulate e-commerce growth.

The research of critical e-commerce factors in France by Colla and Lapoule revealed that an integrated multichannel approach for online business requires more differentiated logistical system and improved customer relations marketing. The number of internet users in less developed provinces was considered as a constraint for e-commerce growth. Meanwhile, Internet usage is beginning to increase outside of the wealthy and educated urban elite as more people go online in China. The overall trend of the expected growth of middle- and upper-income categories to some 190 million by 2020 from 17 million in 2010 makes the whole market attractive for foreign direct investments. Unlike a few decades ago when low-cost production attracted companies to enter the market, nowadays, the consumption forecast opens up new opportunities due to triple growth of Chinese economy during 2000 to 2010. So as to identify the most attractive region for the investors in China, 15 factors were chosen (Fig. 2) for the general choice algorithm.

Fig. 2 Factors taken into general choice algorithm



In support of e-commerce enterprise location in China, governmental regulations trigger the business activity at local level in many regions. In particular, the government of China develops comprehensive cross-border e-commerce zones. These zones are designated exclusively for the development of cross-border e-commerce industry, as they target preferential tax policies and streamlined customs clearance procedures. Such zones have been developed in three stages, starting from zone Hangzhou, home to the e-commerce giant Alibaba that was established in 2015 (first phase). The latest, third phase, which was announced recently, in July 2018 foresees the creation of the additional 22 zones). Thus, according to Acolink.com, in China, 35 cross-border e-commerce zones will be developed. Their location in regard to 22 Chinese provinces, as well as to five Autonomous Regions (Inner Mongolia, Guangxi, Tibet, Ningxia, and Xinjiang) and four Chinese municipalities (Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Chongqing), which are under the direct administration of central government, has been summarized in Table 1. Additionally, at this table, the "E-commerce development plan" in Xinjiang is depicted. According to Hongfei, this plan was designed to facilitate exports to the Middle East and East Asia. Hongfei also noted that Guangxi Province promoted cooperation between China and Vietnam through E-commerce trade and cooperation. Heilongjiang Province listed the Suifenhe border economic cooperation zone as a base of cross-border e-commerce development and focused on opening cross-border trade with Russia. Recent news also mentioned about the creation of free trade zone in Luoyang in addition to already established zone in Zhengzhou.

Table 1 Provinces of China with cross-border comprehensive e-commerce zones (number of zones in each province)

Province Administrative center Number of Zones (*E-commerce development plan) Row average values from normalized matrix
Anhui Hefei 1 0.027
Fujian Fuzhou 1 0.027
Gansu Lanzhou 1 0.027
Guangdong Guangzhou 4 0.108
Guizhou Guiyang 1 0.027
Hainan Haikou 1 0.027
Hebei Shijiazhuang 1 0.027
Heilongjiang Harbin 1 0.027
Henan Zhengzhou 1 0.054
Hubei Wuhan 1 0.027
Hunan Changsha 1 0.027
Jiangsu Nanjing 3 0.081
Jiangxi Nanchang 1 0.027
Jilin Changchun 1 0.027
Liaoning Shenyang 2 0.054
Qinghai Xining 0 0.000
Shanxi Taiyuan 0 0.000
Shandong Jinan 2 0.054
Shaanxi Xi’an 1 0.027
Sichuan Chengdu 1 0.027
Yunnan Kunming 1 0.027
Zhejiang Hangzhou 3 0.081
Beijing Beijing 1 0.027
Shanghai Shanghai 1 0.027
Tianjin Tianjin 1 0.027
Chongqing Chongqing 1 0.027
Inner Mongolia Hohhot 1 0.027
Guangxi Nanning 1 0.027
Tibet Lhasa 0 0.000
Ningxia Yinchuan 0 0.000
Xinjiang Urumchi 1 0.027
Entries in boldface are largest values to identify highest performing regions

The availability and closeness to these zones is essential in terms of logistics processes. Specifically, the bonded warehouse model can be used for the delivery of the products to final clients from abroad. Investors may set up a warehouse within their respective e-commerce zone. Goods will then be transported and stored temporarily within the warehouse under the Customs supervision, before they are delivered to domestic customers. In this case, the delivery time can be reduced to 5 days, compared to the direct shipping model that requires 7–30 days for delivery. The reason for long deliveries is that under the direct sale model, foreign manufacturers maintain warehouses in their home countries and send goods to customers after they have made orders online that involves a relatively more complicated customs clearance procedure. As can be seen from Table 1 and after a provided pair-wise comparison, the most preferred regions are Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang while Qinghai and Shanxi regions are less prioritized by the criterion of e-commerce zones availability.

Apart from the regulative preferences, it is essential to take into account the potential basic conditions for the developing of the online retail trade. For these reasons, total sales and purchases value of retail trade, as well as a number of corporate enterprises of retail trade and stock of retail trade across Chinese provinces have been analyzed by the pair-wise comparison. The total purchases value refer to the total value of purchases of commodities by enterprises (establishments) from other establishments or individuals (including direct import from abroad) for the purpose of re-selling, either with or without further processing of the commodities purchased. Sales value of retail trade refers to the value of commodities sold by the establishments to other establishments and individuals. The commodities include: (1) commodities sold to urban and rural residents and social groups for their consumption; (2) commodities sold to establishments in all industries for their production and operation, including commodities sold to wholesale and retail establishments for re-selling, with or without further processing; and (3) commodities for direct export to abroad.

The value of commodities stock imply the total amount of commodities possessed by wholesaler and retailer of various types of registration status, including different types of stocks: (1) located in storage, garages, counters, and shelves of operating places of wholesale and retail trades (such as sale stores, wholesale centers, procurement stations and operating offices); (2) commodities in the process of being selected, sorted, and packed; (3) commodities not arrived but recorded as purchase in the account; and (4) commodities purchased for other units, but not delivered yet, etc. The figures for the analyses (i.e. total sales and purchases value of retail trade, as well as a number of corporate enterprises of retail trade and stock of retail trade) were obtained from China's National Bureau of Statistics. However, due to the reason of text volume restriction, only the outcome from the processed initial data is represented in Table 2.

Table 2 Basic conditions of retail trade (purchases, sales, and stock values)

Province Preference vectors for the criteria
Number of corporate enterprises of retail trade (Unit) Sales value (Yuan) Purchase value (Yuan) Stock Value (Yuan)
Beijing 0.020 0.063 0.069 0.057
Tianjin 0.012 0.025 0.023 0.015
Hebei 0.026 0.026 0.027 0.028
Shanxi 0.021 0.000 0.016 0.022
Inner Mongolia 0.014 0.014 0.013 0.012
Liaoning 0.025 0.027 0.026 0.025
Jilin 0.018 0.016 0.015 0.013
Heilongjiang 0.013 0.014 0.013 0.013
Shanghai 0.019 0.057 0.053 0.086
Jiangsu 0.087 0.093 0.092 0.092
Zhejiang 0.057 0.066 0.064 0.069
Anhui 0.047 0.033 0.033 0.031
Fujian 0.057 0.038 0.036 0.030
Jiangxi 0.024 0.016 0.016 0.034
Shandong 0.088 0.084 0.087 0.062
Henan 0.080 0.046 0.045 0.038
Hubei 0.052 0.060 0.062 0.058
Hunan 0.048 0.037 0.036 0.047
Guangdong 0.086 0.101 0.095 0.105
Guangxi 0.020 0.014 0.014 0.019
Hainan 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.005
Chongqing 0.035 0.031 0.029 0.021
Sichuan 0.046 0.047 0.048 0.035
Guizhou 0.021 0.014 0.013 0.013
Yunnan 0.023 0.020 0.020 0.018
Shaanxi 0.034 0.028 0.028 0.027
Gansu 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.008
Qinghai 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Tibet 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Ningxia 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003
Xinjiang 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.011
  1. Note: In parenthesis, the units are for the initial values of data processed in pair-wise comparison
  2. Entries in boldface are largest values to identify highest performing regions
In the analysis of basic conditions of retails trade among the Chinese provinces, an outstanding concentration of retail purchase, sales, and stock values can be noticed in four regions (Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shandong, and Shanghai; Table 2). The availability of stock values also may indicate the potential availability of warehousing capacity in these provinces. Large warehouses are necessary, if the deliveries are done over long distances. Well-developed transport infrastructure is also important as the main prerequisite for faster deliveries. Therefore, further on, the group of transport factors will be considered.

It should be noted that the goods that are sold via the online trading platforms are subject to the so-called parcel deliveries. That is why potential foreign investors, planning to operate businesses in China should be aware of logistics provides, such as SF Express, STO Express, YTO Express, and ZTO Express and their outlets for express services. These four companies now represent over 80% of the express delivery market share in China. Additionally, availability of postal offices and postal delivery routes allocation across Chinese provinces influence the decisions. Postal routes imply the connections between the post offices, post offices and agencies, agencies and railway stations, docks, airports, and transfer stations. By the modes of transport, the postal routes can be divided into airmail postal routes, railway postal routes, car postal routes, waterway postal routes and others, and can be analyzed in details from the website of National Bureau of Statistics (2018). In the current analysis, only the total length of postal routes was considered (Table 3).

Table 3 Pair-wise comparison of provinces (logistics infrastructure for parcel deliveries)

Province Preference vectors for the criteria
Number of postal offices (unita) Number of outlets for express services (unita) Length of postal routes (kma)
Beijing 0.033 0.004 0.091
Tianjin 0.009 0.011 0.021
Hebei 0.030 0.003 0.023
Shanxi 0.028 0.003 0.015
Inner Mongolia 0.019 0.021 0.040
Liaoning 0.027 0.032 0.042
Jilin 0.017 0.025 0.019
Heilongjiang 0.022 0.026 0.023
Shanghai 0.035 0.047 0.036
Jiangsu 0.060 0.066 0.031
Zhejiang 0.055 0.071 0.105
Anhui 0.035 0.042 0.009
Fujian 0.034 0.039 0.035
Jiangxi 0.030 0.026 0.014
Shandong 0.047 0.052 0.067
Henan 0.050 0.045 0.023
Hubei 0.055 0.055 0.027
Hunan 0.037 0.042 0.015
Guangdong 0.100 0.132 0.068
Guangxi 0.028 0.029 0.038
Hainan 0.008 0.009 0.014
Chongqing 0.023 0.022 0.021
Sichuan 0.076 0.071 0.041
Guizhou 0.028 0.029 0.015
Yunnan 0.029 0.029 0.042
Shaanxi 0.030 0.026 0.032
Gansu 0.021 0.024 0.029
Qinghai 0.005 0.004 0.014
Tibet 0.004 0.005 0.009
Ningxia 0.006 0.004 0.008
Xinjiang 0.018 0.006 0.031
  1. Notea: In parenthesis the units are for the initial values of data processed in pair-wise comparison
  2. Entries in boldface are largest values to identify highest performing regions
The results of the analysis show that logistics infrastructure for parcel delivery is better developed in Guangdong, Zhejiang, Sichuan, Shandong, Jiangsu and Hubei (Table 3), and therefore, these regions are more advantageous for e-commerce enterprise development, especially when considering an invisible part of an online trade. However, not only logistics infrastructure, but also telecommunication development is critical for the doing of e-commerce businesses. Due to this fact, below is the analysis of main indicators of Internet provision. That is the broadband subscribers port of Internet, number of websites, and number of Internet users (Table 4).

Table 4 Main indicators of Internet development

Province Preference vectors for the criteria
Broadband subscribers port of Internet Number of websites Number of Internet users
Beijing 0.016 0.155 0.024
Tianjin 0.010 0.013 0.014
Hebei 0.054 0.032 0.055
Shanxi 0.025 0.014 0.028
Inner Mongolia 0.014 0.004 0.018
Liaoning 0.033 0.030 0.038
Jilin 0.015 0.007 0.020
Heilongjiang 0.019 0.010 0.026
Shanghai 0.021 0.025 0.025
Jiangsu 0.090 0.065 0.063
Zhejiang 0.073 0.085 0.051
Anhui 0.036 0.017 0.038
Fujian 0.039 0.073 0.037
Jiangxi 0.028 0.009 0.028
Shandong 0.080 0.069 0.072
Henan 0.059 0.051 0.057
Hubei 0.038 0.026 0.042
Hunan 0.036 0.018 0.042
Guangdong 0.094 0.185 0.112
Guangxi 0.027 0.011 0.031
Hainan 0.006 0.005 0.007
Chongqing 0.024 0.013 0.022
Sichuan 0.062 0.050 0.050
Guizhou 0.015 0.004 0.021
Yunnan 0.022 0.006 0.026
Shaanxi 0.027 0.015 0.028
Gansu 0.013 0.003 0.015
Qinghai 0.003 0.001 0.004
Tibet 0.001 0.000 0.002
Ningxia 0.004 0.002 0.005
Xinjiang 0.016 0.003 0.000
  1. Entries in boldface are largest values to identify highest performing regions
As can be seen from Table 4, by the criterion of the Internet development, the most favourable regions are Guangdong, Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Beijing, and Henan. Further on, the group of socio-economic factors that can be important for the enterprise arrangement from a financial point of view will be described. That is the level of wages, unemployment rate, and labour productivity. On the whole, wages are important for the investments in labour-intensive production, since it requires considerable labour capital, and regions with lower wages would be more favourable. However, for the omnichannel shop project, this factor is not so critical. The same can be applied to the labour productivity factor, i.e. the ratio of the gross regional product in current prices to the number of employees in the region. The other socio-economic indicator is the level of unemployment, which can be considered in a negative connotation. In particular, it was assumed that growth of the unemployment rate reduces purchasing and investment demand, production, therefore, if the unemployment rate goes down (like in Beijing), the higher is the overall points (Table 5).

Table 5 Indicators of socio-economic development

Province Wages level (Yuan) Unemployment rate (%) Labour productivity (Yuan/person) Preference vectors for the criteria
Wages level (Yuan) Unemployment rate (%) Labour productivity (Yuan/person)
Beijing 119928 1.4 324301.7 0.017 0.071 0.024
Tianjin 86305 3.5 625275.8 0.024 0.028 0.047
Hebei 55334 3.7 501398.5 0.037 0.027 0.038
Shanxi 53705 3.5 303110.2 0.038 0.028 0.023
Inner Mongolia 61067 3.7 618200.1 0.034 0.027 0.047
Liaoning 56015 3.8 396989.6 0.037 0.026 0.030
Jilin 56098 3.5 458693.2 0.037 0.028 0.035
Heilongjiang 52435 4.2 362136.4 0.039 0.024 0.027
Shanghai 119935 4.1 448861.9 0.017 0.024 0.034
Jiangsu 71574 3 516852.2 0.029 0.033 0.039
Zhejiang 73326 2.9 445368.4 0.028 0.034 0.034
Anhui 59102 3.2 472055.3 0.035 0.031 0.036
Fujian 61973 3.9 430760.9 0.033 0.026 0.033
Jiangxi 56136 3.4 392368.5 0.037 0.029 0.030
Shandong 62539 3.5 559660.5 0.033 0.028 0.042
Henan 49505 3 353468.5 0.042 0.033 0.027
Hubei 59831 2.4 454114.7 0.035 0.041 0.034
Hunan 58241 4.2 555081.2 0.035 0.024 0.042
Guangdong 72326 2.5 413037.1 0.029 0.040 0.031
Guangxi 57878 2.9 456355.2 0.036 0.034 0.034
Hainan 61663 2.4 400593 0.033 0.041 0.030
Chongqing 65545 3.7 429679.1 0.032 0.027 0.032
Sichuan 63926 4.2 418200.4 0.032 0.024 0.032
Guizhou 66279 3.2 379307.2 0.031 0.031 0.029
Yunnan 60450 3.6 352962.4 0.034 0.028 0.027
Shaanxi 59637 3.3 379350.2 0.035 0.030 0.029
Gansu 57575 2.2 275918.5 0.036 0.045 0.021
Qinghai 66589 3.1 407749.2 0.031 0.032 0.031
Tibet 103232 2.9 365411.0 0.020 0.038 0.028
Ningxia 65570 3.9 448237.4 0.031 0.026 0.034
Xinjiang 63739 2.5 301101.5 0.032 0.040 0.023
  1. Entries in boldface are largest values to identify highest performing regions

It should be noted that Table 5 presents data on the average annual wages of employed persons in urban units across Chinese regions for the year 2016. The highest level of wages was recorded in the Beijing, Shanghai, and Tianjin (that is why these locations have the lowest scores. The lowest wages are identified in Henan, Heilongjiang, and Shanxi that therefore received the highest scores, according to GCA (Table 5). The unemployment rates are low in Beijing, Gansu, Hubei and Hainan, consequently, these sites are the most favourable by this criterion, while by the labour productivity (Table 5), Tianjin, Inner Mongolia, Shandong, and Hunan can be named as leading ones in the country.

Finally, the cumulative analysis of all the factors described before was provided. With the help of GCA, it was found that Guangdong province is the best for the e-commerce enterprise development as it obtained the highest score, compared to other locations (Table 6).

Table 6 Overall ranking for the decision alternatives, assuming the equal importance of the criteria

Province Wages level (Yuan) Unemployment rate (%) Labour productivity (Yuan/person) Preference vectors for the criteria
Wages level (Yuan) Unemployment rate (%) Labour productivity (Yuan/person)
Beijing 119928 1.4 324301.7 0.017 0.071 0.024
Tianjin 86305 3.5 625275.8 0.024 0.028 0.047
Hebei 55334 3.7 501398.5 0.037 0.027 0.038
Shanxi 53705 3.5 303110.2 0.038 0.028 0.023
Inner Mongolia 61067 3.7 618200.1 0.034 0.027 0.047
Liaoning 56015 3.8 396989.6 0.037 0.026 0.030
Jilin 56098 3.5 458693.2 0.037 0.028 0.035
Heilongjiang 52435 4.2 362136.4 0.039 0.024 0.027
Shanghai 119935 4.1 448861.9 0.017 0.024 0.034
Jiangsu 71574 3 516852.2 0.029 0.033 0.039
Zhejiang 73326 2.9 445368.4 0.028 0.034 0.034
Anhui 59102 3.2 472055.3 0.035 0.031 0.036
Fujian 61973 3.9 430760.9 0.033 0.026 0.033
Jiangxi 56136 3.4 392368.5 0.037 0.029 0.030
Shandong 62539 3.5 559660.5 0.033 0.028 0.042
Henan 49505 3 353468.5 0.042 0.033 0.027
Hubei 59831 2.4 454114.7 0.035 0.041 0.034
Hunan 58241 4.2 555081.2 0.035 0.024 0.042
Guangdong 72326 2.5 413037.1 0.029 0.040 0.031
Guangxi 57878 2.9 456355.2 0.036 0.034 0.034
Hainan 61663 2.4 400593 0.033 0.041 0.030
Chongqing 65545 3.7 429679.1 0.032 0.027 0.032
Sichuan 63926 4.2 418200.4 0.032 0.024 0.032
Guizhou 66279 3.2 379307.2 0.031 0.031 0.029
Yunnan 60450 3.6 352962.4 0.034 0.028 0.027
Shaanxi 59637 3.3 379350.2 0.035 0.030 0.029
Gansu 57575 2.2 275918.5 0.036 0.045 0.021
Qinghai 66589 3.1 407749.2 0.031 0.032 0.031
Tibet 103232 2.9 365411.0 0.020 0.038 0.028
Ningxia 65570 3.9 448237.4 0.031 0.026 0.034
Xinjiang 63739 2.5 301101.5 0.032 0.040 0.023
  1. Entries in boldface are largest values to identify highest performing regions
According to the final analysis, the rating of most beneficial regions for the development of e-commerce enterprise can be drawn. The list of ten preferable locations includes Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, Beijing, Henan, Fujian, Shanghai, Sichuan, and Hubei (Table 6). It should be noted that the three leading regions have the largest amount of e-commerce cross-border zones (four in Guangdong, three in Jiangsu and Zhejiang, Table 1). These are all located close to major container sea ports of the Pearl (e.g. Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou) and Yangtze River Delta (e.g. Shanghai, Ningbo, Suzhou, and Nanjing). However, fourth most beneficial region is Shandong, which is norther located as compared to the first three, and in their close proximity container sea ports are Qingdao, Lianyungang, and Tianjin. This again creates a challenge for currently dominating sea ports, they need to develop best connectivity e.g. with railway based container shuttles (or some other container sea port will do so as container sea ports among Chinese coastal line are numerous). Beijing (fifth) in turn is mostly connected to Tianjin sea port. Henan is sixth most attractive, and it is located at hinterlands (do note Sichuan in the ninth place). This again creates a challenge for currently dominating sea ports, they need to develop best connectivity e.g. with railway based container shuttles (or some other container sea port will do so as container sea ports among Chinese coastal line are numerous).

Based on the general choice algorithm (GCA) we tried to locate some e-commerce companies in the list of ten preferable locations to conduct interview to understand their supply chain network and their customer distribution. Eventually, two e-commerce companies located in Shanghai were willing to take part in this research.