Among the many advantages of being part of the European single market, the European project faces many difficulties and challenges. In this article, you will understand more about these challenges. What is the most prominent challenge facing the European Single Market?
Concluding remarks
The European countries are at a crossroad
between either letting the Union dissolve or radically reforming it.
Today's darkened geopolitical environment requires Europe to act as a
whole. However, the EMU will remain fragile as long as it chooses to
continue to delegate control over its policies to market surveillance. A
true "Hamiltonian moment", which involves adopting a common fiscal
policy in support of the common monetary policy is a matter of urgency.
We
still have a long way to go. Divisions between member countries marked
by opposition between debtors and "frugal" creditors, as well
intra-country political struggles and conflicting interests, have - even
in the face of this dramatic crisis - led to the paralysis of the
European institutions, with the one exception of the ECB. Faced with
what she sees as a serious threat to the EU's survival, the German
Chancellor (and the Commission's president Ursula von der Leyen) have
been driven to action. However, as we argued in Sect. 3, little can be
expected from the NG plan for immediate support. The ability of the SP
to emerge from the crisis will increasingly depend on its ability to
take advantage of the greater flexibility of EU rules for an efficient
use of industrial policy, helping companies and the whole economy to
respond to the challenge posed by social and technological innovation,
the restructuring of production and the reorganization and shortening of
GVCs.
The pandemic will have significant repercussions on the
international organization of production and GVCs (on this point, see
also the contributions to this Forum by Strange and Coveri et al.).
Indeed, the countries initially most affected by Covid (China, Korea,
Italy) are among the most important suppliers of intermediate goods at
the international level. Studies on the propagation of economic shocks
triggered by natural disasters (such as the earthquake that hit Japan in
2011) along the value chains found significant supplier substitution effects. Anecdotal evidence
signals numerous cases of supplier substitution in some countries as a
result of the coronavirus. The extent of
these effects depends on the degree of complexity of the production
chains, which affects the degree of input substitutability. Propagation
effects also depend on the presence of "hub" companies interconnected
with a large number of supplier and customer firms. Future developments are uncertain, depending on the relative
strength of two opposite effects. On the one hand, greater coordination
afforded by digitalisation of production networks could favour
substitution effects (especially in cases where value chains are less
regionalised and the search for new suppliers is more difficult). On the other hand, processes of reshoring
and shortening of value chains could occur, especially where production
chains are less complex or automation is more advanced. The second
possibility could represent an opportunity to reverse the processes of
deindustrialization that have impoverished, above all, the productive
fabric of the peripheral countries.
A third perspective, probably
utopian, could contemplate coordination of coalitions of producers
across EU member states. In a situation of strong productive
complementarities between countries, the fortunes of the producers
(workers and firms) in one country are bound to those in the other. This
would call for a coordinated industrial policy at the European level
aiming at ensuring a balanced development of the economies of its
members through their integration in the European production networks.
In emergency situations where production activities are reduced or
temporarily suspended (as in the case of coronavirus shock), bilateral
agreements (mediated by governments) between producers in different
countries should aim at stabilizing employment levels and pre-existing
supply contracts between firms through "mutualisation" of the required
financial effort. After all, having surprisingly spoken out in favor of
the Eurobonds, the CEO of Volkswagen Herbert Diess could - at one remove
- be also supportive of such a project!