Visual Ageism in the Media
Read through this chapter on ageism in the media.
New Visual Ageism in the Media
The Trend Towards a Positive Representation of Older People
The
trend towards a positive representation of older people in visual media
is embedded in a larger discourse of successful ageing (e.g., Rowe and
Kahn; Ylänne) and active ageing (e.g., WHO). This
discourse empowers older people to live as healthily as possible, and
focuses on the quality of the ageing experience, described by Rowe and
Kahn as "the avoidance of disease and disability, the maintenance
of high physical and cognitive function, and sustained engagement in
social and productive activities". The positive consequences of
this discourse could include adopting an active lifestyle, maintaining
functional health, and enhancing capacities, such as individual
responsibility and civic engagement, which could lead to a reduction of
older people's dependability on public system provision.
On the other hand, the possible negative consequences of this discourse,
including the marginalization of the ageing process and the societal
exclusion of the older-old, especially those who are no longer able to
enjoy so-called successful ageing, are also being debated in the
literature today (e.g., Cole; Neilson; Rozanova; Ylänne).
Katz and Calasanti state that the dominant
successful ageing discourse poses at least two negative consequences for
the ageing process, which are reflected in the imagery used in the
media. Successful ageing is associated with individual choices in terms
of lifestyle and the level of empowerment: success or failure is seen as
the responsibility of the individual and something which an individual
is able to control. In fact, the lifestyle of an individual is rarely a
matter of volition, but an issue of economic opportunities and
constraints, of power and inequalities in access to resources. Once we categorize older people as "winners" or "losers", the
social and structural factors involved in people's "choices" to age
successfully are ignored. Older people in the so-called fourth age in
particular are not able to meet the obligations imposed on them by the
dominant successful ageing discourse. As Rozanova
argues, successful ageing is problematic "in prescribing how older
adults should age, rather than seeking to understand and to describe how
different people make meaning of their lives as they age".
Successful
ageing discourse can be seen as having been produced by a consumerist
approach, a marketing manoeuvre to make senior consumers treat ageing as
a controllable disease, rather than as a natural, universal process. Trying to eliminate the signs of ageing and to
deny the natural process of ageing can be seen to stem from a fear of
the signs of the ageing process, because these signs act as reminders of
our mortality. Consumers have only two
options: to continually attempt to control age-related "problems" or to
refuse to incorporate consumerist choices in their life as part of their
wellbeing. The anti-ageing trend can be seen as
the expression of a marketing discourse to consumers to take
responsibility for their wellbeing, for control of their bodies, and to
avoid social exclusion.
Our review of
empirical studies showed that although the past decades have seen a
gradual increase in the presence of older people in the visual media,
ageism is still prevalent. In the past, ageism in the visual media was
characterized by negative attributes, such as being
"ineffective, unattractive and unhappy", "senile,
stupid, ugly, unskilled, unproductive, unhealthy, badly dressed,
sedentary, and inactive", and "frail, lonely,
dependent and technologically illiterate". Visual
ageism has changed and older people in today's society are depicted as
having positive attributes, such as being "healthy, sexually active,
engaged, productive and self-reliant"; or "healthy,
vigorous, productive, attractive and smart".
Still, as our empirical work shows, not much has changed in the roles
assigned to older people - they still tend to be visually represented in
minor, peripheral, or incidental roles - or in the way older-old adults
are visually represented, namely, as possessing fewer positive
attributes than the younger-old group.
It is also important to
remember that what might be considered "positive" attributes in the
depiction of old age could in fact be a normative construction which has
nothing to do with the real experience of older people in everyday life. As Ylänne states: "In
particular, what might be considered 'positive' portrayals can turn out
to be more ambiguous in their construction of older age than might at
first appear to be the case".
The point we would like to
make is that this portrayal of positive attributes of older people in
our society could also have an ageist dimension. As Giddens
states: "The structural properties of social systems are both medium and
outcome of the practices they recursively organize". New visual
ageism in the media means that, on the one hand, positive attributes
associated with older people as part of the successful ageing discourse
encourage them to live as healthily as possible. On the other hand, this
can act as an enabling constraint, suggesting that good health in later
life is fully the choice and responsibility of the individual, and that
older people who fail to age successfully are somehow themselves to
blame. We are facing a shift from visual ageism
characterized by underrepresentation and the negative representation of
older people to a representation of older age characterized by images of
stereotypically third age older adults, in incidental roles, enjoying
life and living their golden years, while older adults in their fourth
age remain invisible.