## Contingency Tables

### Contingency Tables

#### Learning Objectives

- State the null hypothesis tested concerning contingency tables
- Compute expected cell frequencies
- Compute Chi Square and df

This section shows how to use Chi Square to test the relationship between nominal variables for significance. For example, Table 1 shows the data from the Mediterranean Diet and Health case study.

Table 1. Frequencies for Diet and Health Study.

Outcome | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Diet | Cancers | Fatal Heart Disease | Non-Fatal Heart Disease | Healthy | Total |

AHA | 15 | 24 | 25 | 239 | 303 |

Mediterranean | 7 | 14 | 8 | 273 | 302 |

Total | 22 | 38 | 33 | 512 | 605 |

The question is whether there is a significant relationship between diet and outcome. The first step is to compute the expected frequency for each cell based on the assumption that there is no relationship. These expected frequencies are computed from the totals as follows. We begin by computing the expected frequency for the AHA Diet/Cancers combination. Note that 22/605 subjects developed cancer. The proportion who developed cancer is therefore 0.0364. If there were no relationship between diet and outcome, then we would expect 0.0364 of those on the AHA diet to develop cancer. Since 303 subjects were on the AHA diet, we would expect (0.0364)(303) = 11.02 cancers on the AHA diet. Similarly, we would expect (0.0364)(302) = 10.98 cancers on the Mediterranean diet. In general, the expected frequency for a cell in the ith row and the jth column is equal to

where is the expected frequency for cell is the total for the ith row, is the total for the jth column, and is the total number of observations. For the AHA Diet/Cancers cell, , and Table 2 shows the expected frequencies (in parenthesis) for each cell in the experiment.

Table 2. Observed and Expected Frequencies for Diet and Health Study.

Outcome | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Diet | Cancers | Fatal Heart Disease | Non-Fatal Heart Disease | Healthy | Total |

AHA | 15 (11.02) |
24 (19.03) |
25 (16.53) |
239 (256.42) |
303 |

Mediterranean | 7 (10.98) |
14 (18.97) |
8 (16.47) |
273 (255.58) |
302 |

Total | 22 | 38 | 33 | 512 | 605 |

The significance test is conducted by computing Chi Square as follows.

A key assumption of this Chi Square test is that each subject contributes data to only one cell. Therefore, the sum of all cell frequencies in the table must be the same as the number of subjects in the experiment. Consider an experiment in which each of 16 subjects attempted two anagram problems. The data are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Anagram Problem Data

Anagram 1 | Anagram 2 | |
---|---|---|

Solved | 10 | 4 |

Did not Solve | 6 | 12 |

It would not be valid to use the Chi Square test on these data since each subject contributed data to two cells: one cell based on their performance on Anagram 1 and one cell based on their performance on Anagram 2. The total of the cell frequencies in the table is 32, but the total number of subjects is only 16.

The formula for Chi Square yields a statistic that is only approximately a Chi Square distribution. In order for the approximation to be adequate, the total number of subjects should be at least 20. Some authors claim that the correction for continuity should be used whenever an expected cell frequency is below 5. Research in statistics has shown that this practice is not advisable.

The correction for continuity when applied to contingency tables is called the Yates correction. The simulation tables lets you explore the accuracy of the approximation and the value of this correction.

Source: David M. Lane, https://onlinestatbook.com/2/chi_square/contingency.html

This work is in the Public Domain.