This chapter will introduce you to the fundamental theories and rules that guide the system of accounting. The key tenets of accounting are explained, including: double entry, substance over form, the matching principle, the revenue recognition principle, cost-benefit, materiality, and conservatism, as is their impact on the overall application of GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). The underlying intent behind creating financial reports is for the information in the reports to be reliable enough to support sound business decision-making. By the time you finish this chapter, you should have a better understanding of the overall structure of accounting rules and guiding principles.
Accounting information should possess qualitative characteristics to be useful in decision making. This criterion is difficult to apply. The usefulness of accounting information in a given instance depends not only on information characteristics but also on the capabilities of the decision makers and their professional advisers. Accountants cannot specify who the decision makers are, their characteristics, the decisions to be made, or the methods chosen to make the decisions. Therefore, they direct their attention to the characteristics of accounting information. Note the FASB's graphic summarization of the qualities accountants consider in Exhibit 31.
To have relevance, information must be pertinent to or affect a decision. The information must
make a difference to someone who does not already have it. Relevant information makes a difference in
a decision either by affecting users' predictions of outcomes of past, present, or future events or by
confirming or correcting expectations. Note that information need not be a prediction to be useful in
developing, confirming, or altering expectations. Expectations are commonly based on the present or
past. For example, any attempt to predict future earnings of a company would quite likely start with a
review of present and past earnings. Although information that merely confirms prior expectations
may be less useful, it is still relevant because it reduces uncertainty.
Critics have alleged that certain types of accounting information lack relevance. For example, some
argue that a cost of USD 1 million paid for a tract of land 40 years ago and reported in the current
balance sheet at that amount is irrelevant (except for possible tax implications) to users for decision
making today. Such criticism has encouraged research into the types of information relevant to users.
Some suggest using a different valuation basis, such as current cost, in reporting such assets.
Predictive value and feedback value Since actions taken now can affect only future events,
information is obviously relevant when it possesses predictive value, or improves users' abilities to
predict outcomes of events. Information that reveals the relative success of users in predicting
outcomes possesses feedback value. Feedback reports on past activities and can make a difference in decision making by (1) reducing uncertainty in a situation, (2) refuting or confirming prior
expectations, and (3) providing a basis for further predictions. For example, a report on the first
quarter's earnings of a company reduces the uncertainty surrounding the amount of such earnings,
confirms or refutes the predicted amount of such earnings, and provides a possible basis on which to
predict earnings for the full year. Remember that although accounting information may possess
predictive value, it does not consist of predictions. Making predictions is a function performed by the
Timeliness Timeliness requires accountants to provide accounting information at a time when it
may be considered in reaching a decision. Utility of information decreases with age. To know what the
net income for 2010 was in early 2011 is much more useful than receiving this information a year later.
If information is to be of any value in decision making, it must be available before the decision is made.
If not, the information is of little value. In determining what constitutes timely information,
accountants consider the other qualitative characteristics and the cost of gathering information. For
example, a timely estimate for uncollectible accounts may be more valuable than a later, verified actual
amount. Timeliness alone cannot make information relevant, but potentially relevant information can
be rendered irrelevant by a lack of timeliness.
Exhibit 31: A hierarchy of accounting qualities
In addition to being relevant, information must be reliable to be useful. Information has reliability
when it faithfully depicts for users what it purports to represent. Thus, accounting information is
reliable if users can depend on it to reflect the underlying economic activities of the organization. The
reliability of information depends on its representational faithfulness, verifiability, and neutrality. The
information must also be complete and free of bias.
Representational faithfulness To gain insight into this quality, consider a map. When it shows
roads and bridges where roads and bridges actually exist, a map possesses representational
faithfulness. A correspondence exists between what is on the map and what is present physically.
Similarly, representational faithfulness exists when accounting statements on economic activity
correspond to the actual underlying activity. Where there is no correspondence, the cause may be (1)
bias or (2) lack of completeness.
- Effects of bias. Accounting measurements contain bias if they are consistently too high or too low. Accountants create bias in accounting measurements by choosing the wrong measurement method or introducing bias either deliberately or through lack of skill.
- Completeness. To be free from bias, information must be sufficiently complete to ensure that
it validly represents underlying events and conditions. Completeness means disclosing all
significant information in a way that aids understanding and does not mislead. Firms can reduce
the relevance of information by omitting information that would make a difference to users.
Currently, full disclosure requires presentation of a balance sheet, an income statement, a
statement of cash flows, and necessary notes to the financial statements and supporting schedules.
Also required in annual reports of corporations are statements of changes in stockholders' equity
which contain information included in a statement of retained earnings. Such statements must be
complete, with items properly classified and segregated (such as reporting sales revenue
separately from other revenues). Required disclosures may be made in (1) the body of the financial
statements, (2) the notes to such statements, (3) special communications, and/or (4) the
president's letter or other management reports in the annual report.
Another aspect of completeness is fully disclosing all changes in accounting principles and their
effects. Disclosure should include unusual activities (loans to officers), changes in expectations (losses
on inventory), depreciation expense for the period, long-term obligations entered into that are not
recorded by the accountant (a 20-year lease on a building), new arrangements with certain groups
(pension and profit-sharing plans for employees), and significant events that occur after the date of the
statements (loss of a major customer). Firms must also disclose accounting policies (major principles
and their manner of application) followed in preparing the financial statements. Because of its
emphasis on disclosure, we often call this aspect of reliability the full disclosure principle.
Verifiability Financial information has verifiability when independent measurers can
substantially duplicate it by using the same measurement methods. Verifiability eliminates measurer
bias. The requirement that financial information be based on objective evidence arises from the
demonstrated needs of users for reliable, unbiased financial information. Unbiased information is
especially necessary when parties with opposing interests (credit seekers and credit grantors) rely on
the same information. If the information is verifiable, this enhances the reliability of information.
Financial information is never completely free of subjective opinion and judgment; it always
possesses varying degrees of verifiability. Canceled checks and invoices support some measurements.
Accountants can never verify other measurements, such as periodic depreciation charges, because of
their very nature. Thus, financial information in many instances is verifiable only in that it represents a
consensus of what other accountants would report if they followed the same procedures.
Neutrality Neutrality means that the accounting information should be free of measurement
method bias. The primary concern should be relevance and reliability of the information that results
from application of the principle, not the effect that the principle may have on a particular interest.
Non-neutral accounting information favors one set of interested parties over others. For example, a
particular form of measurement might favor stockholders over creditors, or vice versa. "To be neutral,
accounting information must report economic activity as faithfully as possible, without coloring the
image it communicates for the purpose of influencing behavior in some particular direction".
Accounting standards are not like tax regulations that deliberately foster or restrain certain types of
activity. Verifiability seeks to eliminate measurer bias; neutrality seeks to eliminate measurement
When comparability exists, reported differences and similarities in financial information are real
and not the result of differing accounting treatments. Comparable information reveals relative
strengths and weaknesses in a single company through time and between two or more companies at
the same time.
Consistency requires that a company use the same accounting principles and reporting practices
through time. Consistency leads to comparability of financial information for a single company
through time. Comparability between companies is more difficult because they may account for the
same activities in different ways. For example, Company B may use one method of depreciation, while
Company C accounts for an identical asset in similar circumstances using another method. A high
degree of inter-company comparability in accounting information does not exist unless accountants
are required to account for the same activities in the same manner across companies and through time.
As we show in Exhibit 31, accountants must consider one pervasive constraint and one threshold for
recognition in providing useful information. First, the benefits secured from the information must be
greater than the costs of providing that information. Second, only material items need be disclosed and
accounted for strictly in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We
discussed cost-benefit and materiality earlier in the chapter.
An accounting perspective: Use of technology
You may want to visit the home page of the Financial Accounting Standards Board at:
You can check out the latest developments at the FASB to see how the rules of
accounting might be changing. You can investigate facts about the FASB, press
releases, exposure drafts, publications, emerging issues, board actions, forthcoming
meetings, and many other topics.