More on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Read this article that explains the basic principles of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, which was passed in response to a series of large accounting scandals. This will help you understand some of the rules which govern public companies you may work for or invest in.
Background
In
2002, Sarbanes-Oxley was named after bill sponsors U.S. Senator Paul
Sarbanes (D-MD) and U.S. Representative Michael G. Oxley (R-OH). As a
result of SOX, top management must individually certify the accuracy of
financial information. In addition, penalties for fraudulent financial
activity are much more severe. Also, SOX increased the oversight role of
boards of directors and the independence of the outside auditors who
review the accuracy of corporate financial statements.
The
bill was enacted as a reaction to a number of major corporate and
accounting scandals, including those affecting Enron, Tyco
International, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems, and WorldCom. These scandals
cost investors billions of dollars when the share prices of affected
companies collapsed, and shook public confidence in the US securities
markets.
The
act contains eleven titles, or sections, ranging from additional
corporate board responsibilities to criminal penalties, and requires the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to implement rulings on
requirements to comply with the law. Harvey Pitt, the 26th chairman of
the SEC, led the SEC in the adoption of dozens of rules to implement the
Sarbanes–Oxley Act. It created a new, quasi-public agency, the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, charged with overseeing,
regulating, inspecting, and disciplining accounting firms in their roles
as auditors of public companies. The act also covers issues such as
auditor independence, corporate governance, internal control assessment,
and enhanced financial disclosure. The nonprofit arm of Financial
Executives International (FEI), Financial Executives Research Foundation
(FERF), completed extensive research studies to help support the
foundations of the act.
The
act was approved in the House by a vote of 423 in favor, 3 opposed, and
8 abstaining and in the Senate with a vote of 99 in favor and 1
abstaining. President George W. Bush signed it into law, stating it
included "the most far-reaching reforms of American business practices
since the time of Franklin D. Roosevelt. The era of low standards and
false profits is over; no boardroom in America is above or beyond the
law".
In
response to the perception that stricter financial governance laws are
needed, SOX-type regulations were subsequently enacted in Canada (2002),
Germany (2002), South Africa (2002), France (2003), Australia (2004),
India (2005), Japan (2006), Italy (2006), Israel, and Turkey.
Debates
continued as of 2007 over the perceived benefits and costs of SOX.
Opponents of the bill have claimed it has reduced America's
international competitive edge against foreign financial service
providers because it has introduced an overly complex regulatory
environment into US financial markets. A study commissioned by NYC Mayor
Michael Bloomberg and US Sen. Chuck Schumer, (D-NY), cited this as one
reason America's financial sector is losing market share to other
financial centers worldwide. Proponents of the measure said that SOX
has been a "godsend" for improving the confidence of fund managers and
other investors with regard to the veracity of corporate financial
statements.
The
10th anniversary of SOX coincided with the passing of the Jumpstart Our
Business Startups (JOBS) Act, designed to give emerging companies an
economic boost, and cutting back on a number of regulatory
requirements.