As you read this text, pay close attention to the section on investment bankers since it discusses the economic changes the business will experience and what it will report to shareholders and customers.
Reasons for Combining Businesses
Business combinations seek to unlock value within either firm that would not be realized if the firms continued separately.
Reasons for Business Combinations
Business combinations are called mergers. A merger happens when two firms agree to form one new company rather than remain separately owned and operated. This action is a merger of equals. The firms are often approximately the same size.
Both companies' stocks are surrendered, and new company
stock is issued in its place. In practice, however, mergers of
equals do not occur very often. Usually, one company buys another
and, as part of the deal's terms, allows the acquired firm to
proclaim the action is a merger of equals, even if it is
technically an acquisition. A merger can also be achieved independently
of the corporate mechanics through various means – such as a triangular
merger, statutory merger, etc.
Every merger has reasons why combining two companies is a good business decision. The
underlying principle is simple: 2 + 2 = 5. In other words, combining two companies will be worth more than the sum of its
parts. The dominant rationale used to explain merging activity is that
acquiring firms improves financial performance.
The following
factors are considered to improve financial performance:
-
Synergy: Synergy is two or more things functioning together to
produce a result not independently obtainable. If used in a business
application, synergy means teamwork will produce a better
result than if each group member worked toward the same
goal individually. Synergy can take the form of higher revenues, lower
expenses, or a lower overall cost of capital.
- Economy of
scale: The combined company can often reduce its fixed costs by removing
duplicate departments or operations, or lowering the company's costs relative to the same revenue stream, thus increasing profit
margins.
- Economy of scope: This refers to the efficiencies
primarily associated with demand-side changes, such as increasing or
decreasing the scope of marketing and distribution, of different types
of products.
- Increased revenue or market share: This assumes the buyer will absorb a major competitor and increase
its market power (by capturing increased market share) to set prices.
-
Cross-selling: For example, a bank buying a stock broker could sell its banking products to their customers, while the
broker can sign up the bank's customers for brokerage accounts.
-
Taxation: A profitable company can buy a loss maker to use the
target's loss to reduce its tax liability. In the
United States and many other countries, rules are in place to limit the
ability of profitable companies to shop for loss-making companies,
limiting the tax motive of an acquiring company.
-
Geographical or other diversification: This is designed to smooth the
earnings results of a company, which balances the company's stock price over the long term, giving conservative investors more confidence
in investing in the company.
- Hiring: Some companies use
acquisitions as an alternative to the normal hiring process. This is
especially common when the target is a small private company or is in
the start-up phase. In this case, the acquiring company hires the
staff of the target private company, thereby acquiring its talent (its main asset and appeal).
- Diversification: A merger may hedge a company against a downturn in an industry by providing the opportunity to make up profits in the industry of the target company.
Additional motives for a merger that may not add shareholder value include:
-
Manager's hubris: A manager's overconfidence about expected
synergies from a merger may result in overpayment for the target
company.
- Empire-building: Managers have larger companies to manage and hence more power.
-
Manager's compensation: In the past, executive
management teams were paid based on the total profit of the company instead
of the profit per share. This would give management the incentive to buy
companies to increase the total profit while decreasing the profit per
share (which hurts the owners of the company, the shareholders).
- Positioning: This involves combining two companies to exploit future opportunities.
- Gap filling: The strength of one company may be the weakness of the other, and vice versa.
Key Takeaways
- The dominant rationale used to explain merging activity is that acquiring firms seek improved financial performance.
- If used in a business application, synergy means that teamwork will produce an overall better result than if each person within the group was working toward the same goal individually.
- Positioning involves combining two companies in order to exploit future opportunities.
- Gap filling is a reason for merging, referring to the fact that the strength of one company may be the weakness of the other, and vice versa.
Key Terms
- Synergy: Benefits resulting from combining two different groups, people, objects, or processes.
- Statutory merger: A type of merger where one of the companies remains a legal entity, rather than a part of an entirely new legal entity.
Source: Boundless, https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-finance/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.