Group Size and Structure
This article discusses three types of leadership styles. What kind of leader do you prefer – democratic, authoritarian, or laissez-faire? What kind of leader will you be when you have an analytic team to manage?
The article also delves into the psychology of teams. Conformity is the enemy of imagination. The need for conformity of thought can devolve into groupthink or a situation when the lowest common denominator of thought prevails. This environment stifles creativity and diversity and causes teams to concentrate on getting a job done, not doing it in the most innovative ways.
Dyads, Triads, and Large Groups
Cadets illustrate how strongly conformity can define groups.
A small group is typically one where the collection of people is small enough that all members of the group know each other and share simultaneous interaction, such as a nuclear family, a dyad, or a triad. Georg Simmel (1858–1915) wrote extensively about the difference between a dyad, or two-member group, and a triad, which is a three-member group. In the former, if one person withdraws, the group can no longer exist. We can think of a divorce, which effectively ends the "group" of the married couple or of two best friends never speaking again. In a triad, however, the dynamic is quite different. If one person withdraws, the group lives on. A triad has a different set of relationships. If there are three in the group, two-against-one dynamics can develop, and there exists the potential for a majority opinion on any issue. Small groups generally have strong internal cohesiveness and a sense of connection. The challenge, however, is for small groups to achieve large goals. They can struggle to be heard or to be a force for change if they are pushing against larger groups. In short, they are easier to ignore.
It is difficult to define exactly when a small group becomes a large group. Perhaps it occurs when there are too many people to join in a simultaneous discussion. Or perhaps a group joins with other groups as part of a movement that unites them. These larger groups may share a geographic space, such as a fraternity or sorority on the same campus, or they might be spread out around the globe. The larger the group, the more attention it can garner, and the more pressure members can put toward whatever goal they wish to achieve. At the same time, the larger the group becomes, the more the risk grows for division and lack of cohesion.
Source: OpenStax CNX, https://courses.lumenlearning.com/sociology/chapter/group-size-and-structure/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.