ESL004 Discussion: Synthesis Essay

I've read the essay example discussing the topic: " Is The Future Paperless ? ". Then, I try creating one on the same topic. Here's my finished essay:

IS THE FUTURE PAPERLESS ?

A paperless society is a society in which paper communication (written documentd, mail, etc.) is replaced by electronic communication and storage. The concept originated by Frederick Wilfrid Lancaster in 1978. A big question here is: Is the future paperless?. For countries or governments, companies, anything to do with office works, the answer is likely yes, because of cost reduction. How ever, for schools, the answer is likely no. In my opinion, the answer is no for schools because of the risk of hacks or lost data, worse result in comprehension outcomes, and less comfortable reading.

First, the risk of hacks or lost data. According to the essay example that I've read "Students records contain sensitive information, and if online, in a paperless system, these records can be vulnerable to hacking". In addition, paper documentation is still critical in the school environment, especially in administration.

In fact, paperless system has a worse result in comprehension outcomes. One study published in 2018 involving over 171,000 participants, found paper-based reading results in better information retention and comprehension outcomes than on-screen reading. Students reading text on paper performed better on comprehension tests than students reading the same text on a screen. How  can this happen?, the researchers believe that this is because reading on paper allows for deeper processing of the material, as it requires more attention and focus.

Finally, for myself, I feel more comfortable and more relaxed when I read on paper than on a screen. I'm more easily distracted when I read on a screen, which makes me more difficult to concentrate. In addition, I'm really into sitting in a quiet place and settling in to read a book deeply than to read on a screen. I'm also used to getting tired and bored quicker if I read on a screen.

Paperless is a good concept for cost reduction and effectiveness of communication. Therefore, the concept is good for companies, governments, or something to do with office works, but it can be bad or difficult for educational institutions like schools to fully paperless-based because of the risk of hacks or lost data, worse result in comprehension outcomes, and less comfortable reading. I know that paperless concept has many positive impacts. And the downsides of implementing it can be reduced to make a better future life. That all. Big Thanks. 12/02/2024.

 The Internet has completely changed the way we live by bringing people together worldwide and turning the entire world into a global village. With its founding, communication, trade, and knowledge sharing underwent a change. The Internet has come a long way from its beginnings as a research project to as well as a fill storing platform for individauls and companies

Communication has been the epitome of technology revolution. This has introduced social media platforms, email, and instant messaging changing the way we communicate by allowing real-time relationships across borders. In addition to fostering stronger interpersonal relations, technology has brought about several effects on economical and political.

In commerce, technology has made easy to access goods and services globally. While still at home I can purchase products from a different continent and pay for the merchandise which will take a few days for my products to be delivered. All this has been made possible by advances in technology.

In political development, politics has played a significant role shaping how campaigns are run, to how informantion is dessiminated, and how citizens engage with their representatives. From social media platforms to influencing public opinions to data analytics aiding in targeted campaigns.

In conclusion, I believe microsoft has played a significant role in ensuring these technology advances can reach many people around the world for example by making the gifthub accessible to many technology companies.

Since its founding in 1975, Microsoft has been at the forefront of the tech industry, revolutionizing personal computing with its Windows operating system. From Windows 1.0 to Windows 10 and beyond, Microsoft's commitment to innovation has propelled it to become a global technology powerhouse.

Beyond operating systems, Microsoft's suite of productivity tools, including Office and Teams, has transformed how businesses operate and individuals collaborate. The company's entry into hardware with products like the Xbox gaming console and the Surface lineup has further diversified its offerings, captivating consumers worldwide.

Moreover, Microsoft's investment in cloud computing through Azure has positioned it as a leader in the digital transformation of businesses, offering scalable solutions for organizations of all sizes. Its commitment to accessibility, sustainability, and social responsibility, exemplified through initiatives like Microsoft Philanthropies, underscores its dedication to using technology for positive change.

Under the leadership of CEO Satya Nadella, Microsoft has embraced a culture of innovation and inclusivity, driving advancements in artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and mixed reality. As technology continues to evolve, Microsoft remains at the forefront, shaping the future of the tech industry and empowering individuals and organizations to achieve more.

Before reading the article, I have read the articles mentioned, Microsoft purchasing Git Hub is such a disaster for developers.Microsoft company always had a bad reputation in the open-source communities. Since the early days, the company being seen as the evil corporation for several reasons.One of them is, when an uninterruptive upgrade pops up, important meetings have to be adjourned and rearranged. This kind of arrogance has been making people to have bad impression on Microsoft for many years.Thus, developers start to concern about the independence, which is the GitHub's biggest strength. The Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub raised concerns among developers that Microsoft involvement would affect GitHub's generous of sharing software code and open-source projects.

       The writer described the future projects and ideas in the article about how Microsoft company would support and maintain GitHub's quality, and also mentioned GitHub's values.GitHub's New CEO said that,  Microsoft want to make the website accessible around the world.In addition, after the acquisition of GitHub, he will keep customer first values and will operate independent community as always.GitHub's was used by 31 million developers worldwide and gigantic social media platforms use  GitHub for their open-source projects and these statistic actors show it's net-worth.

In my point of view, the facts mentioned above points the writer's idea of  how Microsoft would get benefits by purchasing GitHub. By Microsoft purchasing of Git-Hub, the company will be able communicate and collaborate 31million developers around the world.Form that they can get income through the GitHub website and also could be able to get potential customers for the future projects.Besides, by controlling GitHub which is used by giant social media platforms for open-source projects, Microsoft would stay influential in the IT business.

By synthesizing them, I can finally realize that the negative thoughts of the developers who is using GitHub, could be the results of deduction based on the past of Microsoft company's strategies and after reading this article, I can guess that they may change their way to get more profits from the customers across the globe.

As I know,Microsoft is the biggest and enormous American multinational technology software corporation on Earth.Github is highlighted as a code of hosting platform for the collaboration and version control. It makes you easy to work with others along with the projects wherever you are.

In points of the topic,Microsoft acquisition of Github makes so much sense and strategically sound.It creates the start-up with a new home and unlimited runaway to enhansing its tools for open-source development .

As GitHub is a developer platform that allows developers to create, store, manage and share their code it becomes accessible to more developers around the world" as well as "reliability, security, and performance" were in "top of mind" for them. Giant Microsoft technology  had not  establishing software code hosting and version controlling website GitHub previousl but now technology Giant Microsoft Completes Acquisition of GitHub accessible to more developers around the world" as well as "reliability, security, and performance" were in "top of mind" for them so that it becomes  and it becomes most trusted organization, loved many organizations for their open-source projects  before  it  plans for  completed moving from GitHub to GitLab.

pls už ne, nemůžu už, ztrácím to 

### Essay on Microsoft's Acquisition of GitHub

Before reading the article about Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub, my understanding was shaped by broader trends in the technology industry, particularly regarding the strategic moves large tech companies make to consolidate their influence and capabilities. I viewed acquisitions like these as primarily motivated by the acquiring company's desire to integrate new technologies, expand user bases, and eliminate competition. I also had a general apprehension about how such acquisitions might affect the independence and integrity of the acquired companies, especially those that serve a broad and diverse community like GitHub.

The article provided a detailed account of Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub, emphasizing the strategic significance and the intentions behind the move. According to the article, Microsoft confirmed its acquisition for $7.5 billion, a move approved by the European Union's regulators. The article highlighted Microsoft's intention to advance GitHub as a platform loved by developers while ensuring its reliability, security, and performance. Nat Friedman, the new CEO of GitHub, stressed that GitHub would continue to operate independently and maintain its developer-first values, alleviating some concerns about potential negative impacts on the platform's community-driven ethos.

One of the key ideas shared by the writer is that despite the acquisition, GitHub aims to remain a trusted and independent platform for developers. The article quoted Friedman, who reassured the community that GitHub's product philosophy and developer-first values would remain intact. Additionally, the article noted the significant number of developers using GitHub and the continued use of the platform by major tech companies, underscoring GitHub's crucial role in the software development ecosystem.

Where my initial ideas and the writer's points come together is in the recognition of the strategic benefits for Microsoft. Both the article and my pre-reading perspective acknowledged that acquiring GitHub offers Microsoft a substantial advantage in terms of access to a vast developer community and numerous open-source projects. This move aligns with Microsoft's broader strategy to support and integrate more open-source technologies, enhancing its cloud and developer services. 

However, my ideas evolved after synthesizing them with the writer's insights. The reassurance provided by both Satya Nadella and Nat Friedman about GitHub's continued independence and focus on reliability and performance helped mitigate my initial concerns. Understanding Microsoft's approach, which respects and aims to preserve GitHub's unique community-driven culture, provided a more nuanced view of the acquisition. This approach contrasts with the more aggressive consolidation tactics often associated with large tech acquisitions.

Furthermore, the article brought to light the competitive landscape, specifically mentioning GNOME's shift from GitHub to GitLab shortly before the acquisition announcement. This move by GNOME suggests a healthy competition in the software hosting market, ensuring that GitHub remains user-focused and innovative to retain its extensive developer base. This aspect of the article expanded my understanding of the ecosystem dynamics, emphasizing that Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub is part of a broader context where multiple platforms vie for developer loyalty.

In conclusion, while my initial thoughts centered on the strategic advantages for Microsoft and potential risks to GitHub's independence, the article highlighted commitments from Microsoft and GitHub to maintain the platform's core values and independence. This synthesis of ideas led to a more balanced view, recognizing the potential benefits of the acquisition while remaining cautious about its long-term impacts. Understanding the competitive pressures and commitments to maintain developer trust enriched my perspective on this significant event in the tech industry.

To be honest, before reading the article, I dont really have any idea regarding GitHub. Maybe I had encountered it, but never had any information about its functions. I had been using platforms such as Facebook, Google and Microsoft, thats why it's a shame that I got no comprehension towards GitHub. Because of this article, I urged myself to search a little bit information about GitHub and I discovered that this is useful portal to create, store, collaborate, and track social projects. Thanks Google.


The writer shared so many ideas that provided me to know and be knowledgable of this platform. And with such informations like Microsoft's plan about acquiring GitHub for a price of 7.5 billion US dollars, Microsoft acquired Xamarin in 2016, Nat Friedman- the new Chief Executive Officer of GitHub- were quoting GitHub being a paltform accessible to developers around the world, and technology giants had been using GitHub.

Ideas had met in regards with the platform being open for all but assures its reliability, security, and performance. It is an essential factor that platforms like social media and searh engine portal should maintain its privacy and the private informations of users being asked to access to these platforms.

After synthesizing my ideas with the writer's article, I can say that I got new informations and more understanding in regards to the topic. I am not so expert with social media platforms, but by using these to create my projects, it gives me some ways to use it on my advantage.

As of my knowledge, Microsoft is the largest-giant American multinational technology software corporation in the whole world. Aside from that, GitHub is a code hosting platform for version control and collaboration. It lets you and others work together on projects from anywhere.

The author shared multiple insights and ideas about the article, such as, first, that Microsoft announced the confirmation of an agreement to acquire GitHub. This aim to empower and enrich developers to bring off more success advancement of the collaboration and also bring Microsoft’s developers’ tools to new users or leads. And second, Nat friedman as the new CEO of GitHub who's also a former CEO of Xamarin(Microsoft acquire it in 2016).

In view of this topic, Microsoft’s acquisition of GitHub makes so much sense, because it gives the start-up a new home, and unlimited runway to keep building its tools for open source while getting the structure it needs to succeed for both the successful and skilled developers and billion of users around the globe.

First of I learned that Microsoft is an American software which helps people to work together from anywhere. And the changes which they made are for good.

Microsoft's Acquisition of GitHub: Impacts on the Tech Industry

Prior to reading this news article, I knew little about Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub beyond the basic headlines. As a major technology company, I assumed Microsoft saw strategic value in acquiring GitHub, but I was unsure of the implications this would have. After analyzing this article, my perspective evolved to appreciate both the opportunities and risks this monumental deal represents.

The article author objectively presents the key facts surrounding Microsoft paying $7.5 billion to acquire the popular code hosting platform GitHub. Details are provided such as the EU approving the deal and Nat Friedman becoming GitHub's CEO under Microsoft. The author notes how Microsoft states GitHub will retain its independence, while Friedman vows to keep GitHub developer-focused. However, the author also highlights open source developers' concerns, evidenced by GNOME migrating off GitHub prior to the acquisition.

My ideas align with the balanced approach of the article. I agree there are reasonable worries among open source programmers about Microsoft controlling GitHub given their past antagonism. But I am also hopeful that Microsoft's assurances of independence are sincere, especially with Friedman at the helm. Only time will tell if Microsoft earns developers' trust through actions, not just words. I believe this acquisition represents a fascinating test case of Microsoft's evolving relationship with the open source community.

Synthesizing my perspectives with those presented in the article leads me to conclude the long-term impacts could be quite positive if Microsoft respects GitHub autonomy. Microsoft can gain deeper ties with developers by running GitHub in a transparent, community-focused manner. However, heavy-handed changes under Microsoft ownership could trigger an exodus of projects from the platform. My ideas expanded to appreciate these nuances.

In summary, this article provided insightful context around the complex dynamics at play in Microsoft's GitHub acquisition. I gained a more thoughtful appreciation of both the risks and potential of this deal. The ultimate results remain uncertain, but will prove instructive on Microsoft's ability to adapt its strategy to the open source era. This will be an acquisition to watch closely as its impacts on the tech industry unfold.

Before reading the article, I had some preconceived notions about Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub. I thought it would be a straightforward business deal, with Microsoft seeking to expand its influence in the software development community. I also wondered how this acquisition would affect GitHub's user base and the open-source projects hosted on the platform.

The writer's ideas, as presented in the article, focused on the facts of the acquisition, the price tag, and the regulatory approval. They also highlighted GitHub's independence and the appointment of Nat Friedman as the new CEO. The writer's tone was neutral, providing an informative overview without expressing personal opinions.

As I read the article, my ideas began to intersect with the writer's. I realized that the acquisition was not just a simple business deal but also a strategic move by Microsoft to tap into GitHub's vast user base and further establish itself as a leader in the tech industry. The writer's emphasis on GitHub's independence and Nat Friedman's appointment as CEO reinforced my initial thoughts about the importance of maintaining user trust and loyalty.

The writer's ideas and mine converged on the significance of the acquisition and its potential impact on the tech industry. We both recognized the importance of GitHub's independence and the need for Microsoft to balance its interests with the needs of the GitHub community. However, the writer's neutral tone and focus on factual reporting allowed me to synthesize my ideas with their presentation, expanding my understanding of the acquisition's implications.

Through this synthesis, my ideas grew and evolved. I began to consider the potential for Microsoft to expand GitHub's features and capabilities, making it an even more essential tool for developers. I also thought about the possibility of GitHub becoming a central hub for software development, version control, and collaboration. The writer's ideas provided a foundation for me to build upon, allowing me to explore new perspectives and potential outcomes.

On the whole, the intersection of my ideas and the writer's ideas enabled a deeper understanding of Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub. By synthesizing our perspectives, I gained new insights into the potential implications and outcomes of this significant deal. The writer's neutral tone and factual reporting provided a valuable foundation for me to expand my thoughts and consider new possibilities.

Before reading the article, I had some preconceived notions about Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub. I thought it would be a straightforward business deal, with Microsoft seeking to expand its influence in the software development community. I also wondered how this acquisition would affect GitHub's user base and the open-source projects hosted on the platform.

The writer's ideas, as presented in the article, focused on the facts of the acquisition, the price tag, and the regulatory approval. They also highlighted GitHub's independence and the appointment of Nat Friedman as the new CEO. The writer's tone was neutral, providing an informative overview without expressing personal opinions.

As I read the article, my ideas began to intersect with the writer's. I realized that the acquisition was not just a simple business deal but also a strategic move by Microsoft to tap into GitHub's vast user base and further establish itself as a leader in the tech industry. The writer's emphasis on GitHub's independence and Nat Friedman's appointment as CEO reinforced my initial thoughts about the importance of maintaining user trust and loyalty.

The writer's ideas and mine converged on the significance of the acquisition and its potential impact on the tech industry. We both recognized the importance of GitHub's independence and the need for Microsoft to balance its interests with the needs of the GitHub community. However, the writer's neutral tone and focus on factual reporting allowed me to synthesize my ideas with their presentation, expanding my understanding of the acquisition's implications.

Through this synthesis, my ideas grew and evolved. I began to consider the potential for Microsoft to expand GitHub's features and capabilities, making it an even more essential tool for developers. I also thought about the possibility of GitHub becoming a central hub for software development, version control, and collaboration. The writer's ideas provided a foundation for me to build upon, allowing me to explore new perspectives and potential outcomes.

On the whole, the intersection of my ideas and the writer's ideas enabled a deeper understanding of Microsoft's acquisition of GitHub. By synthesizing our perspectives, I gained new insights into the potential implications and outcomes of this significant deal. The writer's neutral tone and factual reporting provided a valuable foundation for me to expand my thoughts and consider new possibilities.

Synthesis is a crucial concept that involves combining different elements or ideas to create something new. When we talk about synthesis, we are referring to the process of integrating various sources of information or viewpoints to form a coherent whole. This process is not just about summarizing existing material but about analyzing, interpreting, and reorganizing it to generate fresh insights or perspectives.

In academic settings, synthesis plays a significant role, especially in research papers and essays. Students are often required to synthesize information from multiple sources to develop their arguments or support their claims. This involves critically evaluating various sources, identifying connections between them, and presenting a unified viewpoint that incorporates diverse opinions.

Moreover, synthesis is not limited to academic contexts; it is a skill that is valuable in everyday life. Whether in problem-solving, decision-making, or creative endeavors, the ability to synthesize information is essential. By synthesizing different viewpoints or data, individuals can make informed choices, develop innovative solutions, and broaden their understanding of complex issues.

In conclusion, synthesis is a multifaceted process that goes beyond mere compilation or summarization. It involves the thoughtful integration of diverse elements to create something new and meaningful. Mastering the art of synthesis empowers individuals to navigate the vast sea of information effectively, construct well-supported arguments, and foster creativity in various aspects of life.