Implementation Objectives vs. Outcome Objectives
Read this short article to see the difference between implementation objectives and outcome objectives.
Writing good objectives for your grant can be a challenge. This post is about distinguishing between implementation objectives and outcome objectives.
Implementation objectives define your targets for implementing the program (e.g., Fifty program participants will be enrolled by June 30, 2010, as measured by intake records) and outcome objectives define your ultimate achievement targets (e.g., Forty students will complete the program each year, as measured by achievement of a passing score on the XYZ exam).
Think of it this way: the achievement of an implementation objective proves that you are implementing the program. The achievement of an outcome objective proves that the program works. While implementation objectives are good, outcome objectives guide the true measures of your effectiveness. Generally speaking, funding sources are most interested in your outcome objectives, and when an RFA refers to "Goals and Objectives", it is referring to goals and outcome objectives.
Implementation objectives can also be used, but only when you clearly distinguish them from outcome objectives. Occasionally, a funding source will specifically ask you to list your implementation objectives. In that case, of course, you should follow the directions and provide the requested information, but typically implementation information is provided in the design section of the proposal.
Source: Veronica Robbins, http://grantgoddess.blogspot.com/2010/05/distinguish-implementation-objectives.html
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License.