Implementation Objectives vs. Outcome Objectives
Read this short article to see the difference between implementation and outcome objectives.
Writing good grant objectives can be challenging. This post distinguishes implementation and outcome objectives.
Implementation objectives define your targets for implementing the program (e.g., Fifty program participants will be enrolled by June 30, 2010, as measured by intake records),
Outcome objectives define your ultimate achievement targets (e.g., Forty students will complete the program each year, as measured by achievement of a passing score on the XYZ exam).
Think of it this way: the achievement of an implementation objective proves you are implementing the program. The achievement of an outcome objective proves the program works. While implementation objectives are good, outcome objectives guide the true measures of your effectiveness. Generally speaking, funding sources are most interested in your outcome objectives. When an RFA refers to "Goals and Objectives," it refers to goals and outcome objectives.
Only use implementation objectives when you clearly distinguish them from outcome objectives. Occasionally, a funding source will ask you to list your implementation objectives. In that case, you should follow the directions and provide the requested information, but implementation information is typically provided in the design section of the proposal.
Source: Veronica Robbins, http://grantgoddess.blogspot.com/2010/05/distinguish-implementation-objectives.html
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License.