The Quadratic Formula

Watch these videos and complete the interactive exercises.

Solve equations using structure - Question

Answers

1.

  • x=\sqrt{7}
  • x= -\sqrt{7}
  • x=\sqrt{5}
  • x=-\sqrt{5}

We could solve for x by expanding \left(x^{2}-7\right)^{2}, combining terms that are alike, and using the quadratic formula or factoring to solve for x. However there is a shorter and more elegant way to approach this problem. Let's use structural features to rewrite the equation in a simpler form.

Note that 2 x^{2}-14=2\left(x^{2}-7\right). This means that we can rewrite the equation as:

\left(x^{2}-7\right)^{2}+2\left(x^{2}-7\right)=0

If we let p=x^{2}-7, we can see that this equation is in the form:

p^{2}+2 p=0

Let's solve this equation in terms of p:

p^{2}+2 p=0

p(p+2)=0

p=0 or p=-2

Since p=x^{2}-7, let's substitute this value back into our two solutions in order to solve for x.

x^{2}-7=0 or x^{2}-7=-2

When we solve x^{2}-7=0, we find that x=\pm \sqrt{7}.

When we solve x^{2}-7=-2, we find that x=\pm \sqrt{5}.

In conclusion, the four solutions of the equation \left(x^{2}-7\right)^{2}+2 x^{2}-14=0 are:

  • x=\sqrt{7}
  • x= -\sqrt{7}
  • x=\sqrt{5}
  • x=-\sqrt{5}


Is there another way to solve for x?

In math, there's always another way!

We can use the approach mentioned in hint 1 in order to transform this equation as shown below:

\left(x^{2}-7\right)^{2}+2 x^{2}-14=0

\left(x^{4}-14 x^{2}+49\right)+2 x^{2}-14=0

x^{4}-12 x^{2}+35=0

Now if we use structure in a slightly different way, we can let a=x^{2} and rewrite this equation in a form that allows us to solve it by factoring:

\left(x^{2}\right)^{2}-12\left(x^{2}\right)+35=0

a^{2}-12 a+35=0

(a-7)(a-5)=0

We can conclude that a = 7 or a = 5. Since a=x^{2}, we can write x^{2}=7 and x^{2}=5, which yield the same solutions for x that we already found.

Once again, math is consistent! However, it is often easier (and more fun) to look for structural features when solving quadratic equations.


2. C. m^{2}−7m+6=0

We are asked to rewrite the equation in terms of m, where m = 2x + 3. In order to do this, we need to find all of the places where the expression 2x+3 shows up in the equation, and then substitute m wherever we see them!

For instance, note that -14 x-21=-7(2 x+3). This means that we can rewrite the equation as:

(2 x+3)^{2}-14 x-21=-6

(2 x+3)^{2}-7(2 x+3)=-6


What if I don't see this factorization?

Since m=2x + 3 we can see that m^{2}=(2 x+3)^{2}. But what about the slightly trickier -14x -21?

We know that we must replace all x terms with m-terms. If we solve the equation m=2x+3 for x and substitute this result into the trickier expression, we can rewrite it in terms of m.

Indeed, we can see that x=\frac{m-3}{2}. So

\begin{aligned}
-14 x-21 &=-14\left(\frac{m-3}{2}\right)-21 \\
&=-7(m-3)-21 \\
&=-7 m+21-21 \\
&=-7 m
\end{aligned}

While this approach is longer, we can use it to always find the correct factorization in case we do not see that −14x−21=−7(2x+3).

Now we can substitute m=2x+3:

(m)^{2}-7(m)=-6

Finally, let's manipulate this expression so that it shares the same form as the answer choices:

m^{2}-7 m+6=0

In conclusion, m^{2}-7 m+6=0 is equivalent to the given equation when m=2x+3.


3. x=2 and x= -2

We could solve for x by expanding \left(x^{2}+4\right)^{2} \text { and }-11\left(x^{2}+4\right), combining terms that are alike, and using the quadratic formula or factoring to solve for x. However there is a more elegant way to approach this problem. Let's use structural features to rewrite the equation in a simpler form.

Note that if we let p=x^{2}+4, we can rewrite the equation:

\left(x^{2}+4\right)^{2}-11\left(x^{2}+4\right)+24=0

In particular, we can express it in the form:

p^{2}-11 p+24=0

Let's solve this equation in terms of p:

p^{2}-11 p+24=0

 (p-8)(p-3)=0

p = 8 or p = 3

Since p=x^{2}+4, let's substitute this value back into our two solutions in order to solve for x.

x^{2}+4=8 or  x^{2}+4=3

When we solve x^{2}+4=8, we find that x=\pm 2.

Note that there are no real solutions to the equation x^{2}+4=3.

Why not?

When we try to solve this equation, we immediately get stuck:

x^{2}+4=3

x^{2}=-1

For any positive or negative value of x, the value of x^{2}, must be positive. We can conclude that there are no real values of x that satisfy this equation.

Later on, we will learn that this equation can be solved within the domain of imaginary numbers. Imaginary numbers are of the form a+b i(\text { where } i=\sqrt{-1}).

In conclusion, the two solutions of the equation \left(x^{2}+4\right)^{2}-11\left(x^{2}+4\right)+24=0 are

x=2 and x= -2:


Is there another way to solve for x?

In math, there's always another way!

We can use the approach mentioned in hint 1 in order to transform this equation as shown below:

\begin{array}{r}
\left(x^{2}+4\right)^{2}-11\left(x^{2}+4\right)+24=0 \\
\left(x^{4}+8 x^{2}+16\right)-11 x^{2}-44+24=0 \\
x^{4}-3 x^{2}-4=0
\end{array}

Now if we use structure in a slightly different way, we can let a=x^{2} and rewrite this equation in a form that allows us to solve it by factoring:

\begin{array}{r}
\left(x^{2}\right)^{2}-3\left(x^{2}\right)-4=0 \\
a^{2}-3 a-4=0 \\
(a-4)(a+1)=0
\end{array}

We can conclude that a = 4 and a = -1. Since a=x^{2}, we can write x^{2}=4 and x^{2}=-1, which yield the same solutions for x that we already found.

Once again, math is consistent! However, it is often easier (and more fun) to look for structural features when solving quadratic equations.


4. x=-\frac{3}{2} and x=0

We could solve for x by expanding (2 x+3)^{2}, combining terms that are alike, and using the quadratic formula or factoring to solve for x. However there is a more elegant way to approach this problem. Let's use structural features to rewrite the equation in a simpler form.

Note that  -6 x-9=-3(2 x+3). This means that we can rewrite the equation as:

(2 x+3)^{2}-3(2 x+3)=0

If we let p= 2x + 3, we can see that this equation is in the form:

p^{2}-3 p=0

Let's solve this equation in terms of p:

p^{2}-3 p=0

p(p-3)=0

p=0 or p=3

Since p= 2x + 3, let's substitute this value back into our two solutions in order to solve for x:

2x+3=0 or 2x+3=3

When we solve 2x+3=0, we find that x=-\frac{3}{2}.

When we solve 2x+3=3, we find that x=0.

In conclusion, the two solutions of the equation (2 x+3)^{2}-6 x-9=0 are x=-\frac{3}{2} and x=0.


Is there another way to solve for x?

In math, there's always another way!

We can use the approach mentioned in hint 1 in order to transform this equation as shown below:

\begin{aligned}
(2 x+3)^{2}-6 x-9 &=0 \\
\left(4 x^{2}+12 x+9\right)-6 x-9 &=0 \\
4 x^{2}+6 x &=0 \\
x(4 x+6) &=0
\end{aligned}

We can conclude that x=0 and x=-\frac{3}{2} are both solutions to this equation. Once again, math is consistent! However, it is often easier (and more fun) to look for structural features when solving quadratic equations.