Local
and international issues and barriers are associated with data sharing.
Institutions and publishers revisit publishing requirements on a
continual basis to address these concerns. Therefore, revisiting
publishing requirements is considered a continuous process improvement
strategy to incorporate agreements on data sharing between
organizations.
Read this article and take notes on the ethical
concerns and suggestions listed in each case study. What actions can you
recommend to an employer to mitigate obstacles and issues associated
with data sharing?
Case study 3: the worldwide antimalarial resistance network (WWARN)
Background
WWARN
was established in 2009 to understand and curtail the threat of
antimalarial resistance. Key to the delivery of WWARN's aims was
engaging with global malaria researchers and encouraging them to share
their data with the central WWARN repository, at a time before data
sharing was required by any funders, publishers or regulatory agencies.
The real and perceived challenges to data sharing were many and diverse,
so WWARN developed a number of strategies to enable and encourage
equitable sharing of robust data to inform malaria treatment policies
and practices9. This case study will focus on efforts to promote equity
in sharing of data by, and with, researchers from malaria-endemic
countries.
Malaria is a poverty-related disease, and its control
and eventual eradication are threatened by the spread of parasite
resistance to all currently available antimalarials, including the
pivotal artemisinins that have played a central role in global decreases
in malaria burden since 2000. Promptly sharing reliable data on the
efficacy of antimalarial medicines has the potential to prevent or slow
antimalarial drug resistance. However, requests to share data to address
this critical global health threat have resulted in expressions of
concern from researchers, including that the quality of data may be
scrutinised or study outputs challenged by external researchers, and
that researchers in low-resource malaria-endemic settings are less able
to benefit from the fruits of data sharing than researchers in better
resourced settings.
Over the past decade WWARN has worked with
collaborators in over 280 institutions globally to develop and update
its scientific, technical, ethical and governance frameworks to promote
equity in data sharing. Key aspects of these efforts which address the
primary concerns of the malaria research community are capacity
strengthening and technical support in data standardisation and quality,
as well as inclusion of primary data generators in secondary analyses.
The
impact of these efforts is demonstrated by the size of the WWARN
platform which, thanks to the contributions of the global malaria
research community, now holds over 80% of the world's individual patient
clinical trial data on artemisinin-based combination antimalarials.
These data on factors affecting the efficacy of antimalarial medicines
have been used to optimise treatment regimens for high-risk groups
including pregnant women, young and malnourished children, and provides
evidence to inform the development of new antimalarial drugs.
Selected ethical issues and suggestions for ways forward
1.
In order to address the concerns of many researchers, and not just
those based low-resource settings, that their raw data may not be
entirely ready for international scrutiny and their study outputs
challenged, WWARN has invested heavily in providing researchers with the
resources needed to feel more confident in the quality of data that
they share.
a) WWARN developed and continues to expand its tools
and resources to enhance the efficiency and quality of planning,
executing, analysing and reporting primary data collection (see WWARN
Tools and Resources page).
b) This is supported by WWARN's
external quality assurance and proficiency testing programme, to enhance
data quality and comparability for laboratories conducting antimalarial
drug assays.
c) The WWARN Informatics platform accepts data
submitted in almost any format, with the related protocol / case report
forms / metadata / data dictionaries needed to ensure that data are
useable for secondary analyses. The contributed data are curated and
standardised using established data and statistical management plans.
The "data contributor" receives a study report which includes a list of
changes made during curation and processing and a list of any outliers
or unexpected results. The original data files and the resultant data
set that complies with the Clinical Data Interchange Standards
Consortium (CDISC) standards (where applicable) are stored in the WWARN
repository, which is an re3data registered repository. These outputs are
all available to the contributor or designee, enhancing the quality of
their datasets for their own future use.
2. In order to address
the concerns of many researchers, primarily in low-resource settings,
that they may be less able to benefit from the fruits of data sharing
than researchers in better resourced settings, WWARN has developed a
number of strategies.
a) In order to give data contributors more
choice about how their data can be accessed, WWARN has recently changed
its governance frameworks. Data contributors can now choose between
"contributor controlled access" where the contributor will review each
individual request, or for this to be done through the WHO hosted
independent Data Access Committee.
b) WWARN also organizes study
groups to bring together data contributors conducting individual
participant data meta-analyses to answer important research questions
that cannot be answered as reliably or efficiently by individual studies
or aggregate data meta-analyses.
Examples of impactful
meta-analyses that informed improvements in the treatment of
uncomplicated malaria with the following artemisinin-based combination
treatments:
- Dihydroartemisninin-piperaquine: Improved dosing recommendations in young children;
- Artesunate-amodiaquine: The enhanced efficacy of the fixed dose combination relative to loose tablets; and
- Artemether-lumefantrine: Sub-optimal lumefantrine exposure in malnourished children.
A
research question can be proposed by anyone, and researchers from
malaria endemic countries may be best placed to identify important
knowledge gaps. These study groups not only benefit from pooling the
individual patient data shared, but also from skill-sharing of the
expertise of each of the primary researchers and technical and
statistical support provided through the WWARN data platform. Depending
on each study group member's level of engagement in the secondary
analysis, the members are authors, collaborators, or acknowledged in
resulting publications.
3) Increasing capacity building efforts
to enable researchers from malaria-endemic LMICs to be able to access
and use secondary data to answer questions of importance to malaria and
other NTD control and elimination efforts. These include online open
access resources, training workshops conducted in East, West and
Southern Africa, and to date hosting ten EDCTP/TDR career development
fellows from LMICs to gain the skills required to lead future efforts to
make the best use of available data to inform policy and practice. As a
part of the Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), WWARN also
contributes to work with other research communities to replicate this
model for other neglected, poverty-related diseases and emerging
infections.