Even as humans have sought to dominate nature, the reality is that business systems and the economy are subsystems of the biosphere. Read this chapter to discover the four key "meta-concepts": sustainable development, environmental justice, earth systems engineering and management, and sustainability science. You will also find practical frameworks and tools businesses can apply to develop sustainable innovation.
What is the difference between eco-efficiency and ecosystem solutions? How can the meta-concepts, frameworks, and tools be applied to identify sustainable business practices?
3.4 Practical Frameworks and Tools
Green Engineering
Green engineering, as articulated by Paul Anastas and Julie Zimmerman, is a framework that can be applied at scales ranging from molecules to cities to improve the sustainability of products and processes. Green engineering works from a systems viewpoint and is organized around twelve principles that should be optimized as a system. For instance, one should not design a product for maximum separation and purification of its components (principle 3) if that choice would actually degrade the product's overall sustainability.
The Twelve Principles of Green Engineering
- Principle 1: Designers need to strive to ensure that all material and energy inputs and outputs are as inherently nonhazardous as possible.
- Principle 2: It is better to prevent waste than to treat or clean up waste after it is formed.
- Principle 3: Separation and purification operations should be designed to minimize energy consumption and materials use.
- Principle 4: Products, processes, and systems should be designed to maximize mass, energy, space, and time efficiency.
- Principle 5: Products, processes, and systems should be "output pulled" rather than "input pushed" through the use of energy and materials.
- Principle 6: Embedded entropy and complexity must be viewed as an investment when making design choices on recycle, reuse, or beneficial disposition.
- Principle 7: Targeted durability, not immortality, should be a design goal.
- Principle 8: Design for unnecessary capacity or capability (e.g., "one size fits all") solutions should be considered a design flaw.
- Principle 9: Material diversity in multicomponent products should be minimized to promote disassembly and value retention.
- Principle 10: Design of products, processes, and systems must include integration and interconnectivity with available energy and materials flows.
- Principle 11: Products, processes, and systems should be designed for performance in a commercial "afterlife".
- Principle 12: Material and energy inputs should be renewable rather than depleting.
Green engineering considers two basic priorities above all others: "life-cycle considerations" and "inherency". Life-cycle considerations require engineers and designers to understand and assess the entire context and impact of their products from creation to end of use. Inherency means using and producing inherently safe and renewable or reusable materials and energies. Inherency sees external ways to control pollution or contain hazards as a problem because they can fail and tend to tolerate or generate waste. In this sense, inherency is a stringent form of pollution prevention.
Meanwhile, waste is a concept important in many of the principles of green engineering. As Anastas and Zimmerman explain, "An important point, often overlooked, is that the concept of waste is human. In other words, there is nothing inherent about energy or a substance that makes it a waste. Rather it results from a lack of use that has yet to be imagined or implemented". Waste often has been designed into systems as a tolerable nuisance, but increasingly, we cannot deal with our waste, whether toxins, trash, or ineffective uses of energy and resources. To avoid material waste, for example, we can design products to safely decompose shortly after their useful lifetime has passed (e.g., there is no point in having disposable diapers that outlast infancy by millennia). To avoid wastes within larger systems, we can stop overdesigning them based on worst-case scenarios. Instead, we should design flexibility into the system and look to exploit local inputs and outputs, as the way a hybrid car recovers energy from braking to recharge its battery whereas a conventional car loses that energy as heat. We can also recognize that some highly complex objects such as computer chips may be better off being collected and reused, whereas simpler objects such as paper bags may be better off being destroyed and recycled. In essence, green engineering advocates avoiding waste and hazards to move toward sustainability through more thorough, creative planning and design.
Table 3.2 Summary of Perspective of Green Engineering
Input |
Output |
|
---|---|---|
Material | Renewable/recycled, nontoxic | Easily separable and recyclable/reusable, nontoxic, no waste (eliminated or feedstock for something else) |
Energy | Renewable, not destructive to obtain | No waste (lost heat, etc.), nontoxic (no pollution, etc.) |
Human intelligence | Creative, systems-level design to avoid waste, renew resources, and so forth in new products and processes | Sustainability |