Managing Conflict
Read this section, keeping in mind that there is a difference between constructive conflict and conflict that can damage teams and projects. Have you noticed this distinction in any organizations you have worked for?
Team Conflict Resolution and Management
Some ways of dealing with conflict seek resolution; others aim to minimize negative effects on the team.
Learning Objectives
Differentiate between conflict resolution and conflict managementKey Takeaways
Key Points
- Conflict resolution aims to eliminate disagreements and disputes among team members; in contrast, conflict management seeks to minimize the negative effects of conflict on team performance.
- There are three main approaches to conflict resolution: integrative, distributive, and mediating.
- There are three main conflict-management tactics: smoothing, yielding, and avoiding.
Key Terms
- dispute: An argument or disagreement.
- resolution: The moment in which a conflict ends and the outcome is clear.
- adversarial: Characteristic of an opponent; combative, hostile.
The way a team deals with conflicts that arise among members can
influence whether and how those conflicts are resolved and, as a result,
the team's subsequent performance. There are several ways to approach
managing and resolving team conflict - some leave the team and its members
better able to continue their work, while others can undermine its
effectiveness as a performing unit.
Conflict Resolution
Teams use one of three primary approaches to conflict resolution: integrative, distributive, and mediating.- Integrative approaches focus on the issue to be solved and aim to find a resolution that meets everyone's needs. Success with this tactic requires the exchange of information, openness to alternatives, and a willingness to consider what is best for the group as a whole rather than for any particular individual.
- Distributive approaches find ways to divide a fixed number of positive outcomes or resources in which one side comes out ahead of the other. Since team members have repeated interactions with each other and are committed to shared goals, the expectation of reciprocity can make this solution acceptable since those who don't get their way today may end up "winning" tomorrow.
- Mediating approaches bring in a third party to facilitate a non-confrontational, non-adversarial discussion with the goal of helping the team reach a consensus about how to resolve the conflict. A mediator from outside the team brings no emotional ties or preconceived ideas to the conflict and therefore can help the team identify a broader set of solutions that would be satisfactory to all.
Although these three approaches all bring overt conflict to an end, team
cohesion can suffer if members perceive the process itself as unfair,
disrespectful, or overly contentious. The result can be resentment that
festers and leads to subsequent additional conflict that a more
conciliatory process might have avoided.
Conflict Management
The primary aim of conflict management is to promote the positive effects and reduce the negative effects that disputes can have on team performance without necessarily fully resolving the conflict itself. Teams use one of three main tactics to manage conflict: smoothing, yielding, and avoiding.- The smoothing approach attempts to minimize the differences among the people who are in conflict with each other. This strategy often focuses on reducing the emotional charge and intensity of how the people speak to each other by emphasizing their shared goals and commitments.
- The yielding approach describes the choice some team members make to simply give in when others disagree with them rather than engage in conflict. This is more common when the stakes are perceived to be small or when the team member's emotional ties to the issue at hand are not particularly strong.
- In the avoiding approach, teams members may choose to simply ignore all but the most contentious disagreements. While this can have short-term benefits and may be the best option when the team is under time pressure, it is the approach least likely to produce a sense of harmony among the team.
While conflict can increase the engagement of team members, it can also create distractions and draw attention away from important tasks. Because conflict management seeks to contain such disruptions and threats to team performance, conflicts do not disappear so much as exist alongside the teamwork.