Read this section which introduces how artists collaborate with other artists (and non-artists) to produce works of art. Think about the demands of different kinds of artwork. What rationales do artists create to go beyond themselves and involve others in their creations?
Some of the grandest works of art are made not by a single person but
by many people. Pyramids in Egypt and Mexico are massive structures
built by hundreds of laborers under the direction of designers and
engineers. Egyptian pyramids are tombs for individual
royalty, while those in Mexico function as spiritual altars
dedicated to gods or celestial
objects. They are
typically placed at a prominent site and give definition to the
surrounding landscape. Their construction is the cumulative effort of
many people, and they become spectacular works of art without the
signature of a single artist.
A more contemporary example of art-making as a community effort is the AIDS Memorial Quilt Project.
Begun in 1987, the project memorializes the thousands of
lives lost to the disease through the creation of quilts by families
and friends. Blocks of individual quilts are sewn together to form
larger sections, virtually joining people to share their grief
and celebrate the lives of those lost.
The project is evidence of the beauty and visual spectacle of a huge
community artwork. Today there are over 40,000 individual blocks. The
quilt project is ongoing, growing in size, and exhibited throughout the
world.
Many artists collaborate with non-artists in arrangements designed to produce work for a specific place. Public art is a good example of this. The process usually begins with a select panel of the public and private figures involved in the project who call for submissions of creative ideas surrounding a particular topic or theme, then a review of the ideas submitted and the artist's selection. Funding sources for these projects vary from private donations to using public tax dollars or a combination of the two. Many states have "One Percent for Art" laws on the books, which stipulate that one percent of the cost of any public construction project be used for artwork to be placed on the site.
After the selection process, the artist will commence an intense
collaboration with architects, engineers, public administrators, and
others connected with the project, ultimately resulting in the
installation of a public artwork. Because of its complexity,
this process needs to be expertly managed. Other countries have
similar programs. All of them allow individual artists and collaborative
teams the chance to put a definitive creative stamp on public spaces.
Arne Quinze, The Sequence, 2008. Wood. Installed at the Flemish Parliament Building, Brussels
Public art projects can be subject to controversy. It is not easy for
everyone to agree on what constitutes "good" or "bad" art, or at least
what is appropriate for a public space. The issue takes on a more
complex perspective when public money is involved
in its funding. One example involves Richard Serra's sculpture Tilted Arc from 1981.
Time, resources, a space to work in, a supportive family and public, a culture that respects skill and values creativity and expression: all of these are useful for the artist to thrive. What does an artist give back to society? They give voice to speak of those things that language cannot describe and an experience that pays attention to aesthetics and an interest in the world. They express what it is to be human in all its positive and negative forms. A wonderful example of this is provided in the photography of Don Tremain. His Salty Dogs series of black and white images featuring country musicians quietly speaks to the power of music and the aesthetic image in art and their connection to community, place, and the singular creative act.
Saylor Academy Knowledge Check
Source: Christopher Gildow, http://opencourselibrary.org/art-100-art-appreciation/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.