This chapter reading is a great resource to highlight and reinforce the concepts we learned in the previous video. The chapter begins with the Radio Shack case, which exemplifies the wrong way to communicate bad news. Consider the message, as well as the medium that you would choose in this situation. Also, take a look at the "communication freezers", words that essentially shut down effective communication within your workplace. Do you use these words? What might you say instead to create bridges instead of barriers?
You've Got Mail…and You're Fired! The Case of RadioShack
No
one likes to receive bad news, and few like to give it. In what is
heralded as one of the biggest human resources blunders of 2006, one
company found a way around the discomfort of firing someone
face-to-face. A total of 400 employees at the Fort Worth, Texas,
headquarters of RadioShack Corporation (NYSE: RSH) got the ultimate
e-mail message early one Tuesday morning. The message simply said, "The
work force reduction notification is currently in progress.
Unfortunately, your position is one that has been eliminated". Company
officials argued that using electronic notification was faster and
allowed more privacy than breaking the news in person, and additionally,
those employees who were laid off received generous severance packages.
Organizational consultant Ken Siegel disagrees, proclaiming, "The
bottom line is this: To almost everyone who observes or reads this, it
represents a stupefying new low in the annals of management practice".
It's unclear what, if any, the long-term effect will be for RadioShack.
It isn't just RadioShack that finds it challenging to deal with letting
employees go. Terminating employees can be a painful job for many
managers. The communication that takes place requires careful
preparation and substantial levels of skill. BusinessWeek ethics
columnist Bruce Weinstein suggests that anyone who is involved with
communicating with downsized employees has an ethical responsibility to
do it correctly, which includes doing it in person, doing it privately,
giving the person your full attention, being honest but sensitive, and
not rushing the person. Some organizations outsource the job of letting
someone go to "terminators" who handle this difficult task for them. In
fact, Up in the Air, the 2009 movie starring George Clooney that was
nominated for six Oscars, chronicles changes at a workforce reduction
firm and highlights many of these issues.
Downsizing
has been referred to using many euphemisms (language that softens the
sound of the word) for termination. Here are just a few ways to say
you're about to lose your job without saying you've been fired:
- Career alternative enhancement program
- Career-change opportunity
- Dehiring staff
- Derecruiting resources
- Downsizing employment
- Employee reduction activities
- Implementing a skills mix adjustment
- Negative employee retention
- Optimizing outplacement potential
- Rectification of a workforce imbalance
- Redundancy elimination
- Right-sizing employment
- Vocation relocation policy
Regardless
of how it's done or what it's called, is downsizing effective for
organizations? Jeffrey Pfeffer, a faculty member at Stanford and
best-selling author, argues no:
"Contrary
to popular belief, companies that announce layoffs do not enjoy higher
stock prices than peers - either immediately or over time. A study of 141
layoff announcements between 1979 and 1997 found negative stock returns
to companies announcing layoffs, with larger and permanent layoffs
leading to greater negative effects. An examination of 1,445 downsizing
announcements between 1990 and 1998 also reported that downsizing had a
negative effect on stock-market returns, and the negative effects were
larger the greater the extent of the downsizing. Yet another study
comparing 300 layoff announcements in the United States and 73 in Japan
found that in both countries, there were negative abnormal shareholder
returns following the announcement".
He
further notes that evidence doesn't support the idea that layoffs
increase individual company productivity either: "A study of
productivity changes between 1977 and 1987 in more than 140,000 U.S.
companies using Census of Manufacturers data found that companies that
enjoyed the greatest increases in productivity were just as likely to
have added workers as they were to have downsized".
Discussion Questions
- What communication barriers did RadioShack likely experience as a result of terminating employees via mass e-mail?
- What do you think RadioShack's underlying motivation was in using this form of communication?
- What suggestions for the future would you give RadioShack when faced with the need to dismiss a large number of employees?
- How has technology enhanced our ability to communicate effectively?
In what ways has it hindered our ability to communicate effectively?
- What ethical challenges and concerns do you think individuals involved in downsizing have?