Read these sections to learn how to interpret, make, and apply truth tables to sentential logic formulas, note conditional statements in sentential logic, and translate the word "unless" into sentential logic. Be sure to note the difference between an antecedent and a consequent and between a necessary and sufficient condition.
Complete the exercises, checking your answers against the key.
"Unless"
The English term "unless" can be tricky to translate. For example,
The Reds will win unless their starting pitcher is injured.
If we use the constant "R" to stand for the atomic proposition, "the Reds will
win" and "S" to stand for the atomic proposition, "the Reds' starting pitcher is
injured," how would we translate this sentence using truth functional
connectives? Think about what the sentence is saying (think carefully). Is the
sentence asserting that the Reds will win? No; it is only saying that
The Reds will win as long as their starting pitcher isn't injured.
"As long as" denotes a conditional statement. In particular, what follows the "as
long as" phrase is a sufficient condition, and as we have seen, a sufficient
condition is always the antecedent of a conditional. But notice that the sufficient
condition also contains a negation. Thus, the correct translation of this sentence
is:
~S ⊃ R
One simple trick you can use to translate sentences which use the term "unless"
is just substitute the phrase "if it's not the case that" for the "unless". But
another trick is just to substitute an "or" for the "unless". Although it may
sound strange in English, a disjunction will always capture the truth functional
meaning of "unless". Thus, we could also correctly translate the sentence like
this:
S v R
In the next section we will show how we can prove that these two sentences are
equivalent using a truth table.