Read this section, which differentiates an argument in the logical sense from the ordinary language sense of a heated disagreement and introduces you to the basic structures of logical argument: statements, premises, and conclusions.
Complete Exercise 1, identifying which sentences are statements. Once you identify them, begin thinking about what premises might lead to those statements. When you finish, check your responses with the answer key.
If you would like to download the full textbook, it can be found here: Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking.
What is an argument?
This is an introductory textbook in logic and critical thinking. Both logic and
critical thinking centrally involve the analysis and assessment of arguments.
"Argument" is a word that has multiple distinct meanings, so it is important to
be clear from the start about the sense of the word that is relevant to the study
of logic. In one sense of the word, an argument is a heated exchange of
differing views as in the following:
Sally: Abortion is morally wrong and those who think otherwise are
seeking to justify murder!
Bob: Abortion is not morally wrong and those who think so are right-wing
bigots who are seeking to impose their narrow-minded views on all the
rest of us!
Sally and Bob are having an argument in this exchange. That is, they are each
expressing conflicting views in a heated manner. However, that is not the sense
of "argument" with which logic is concerned. Logic concerns a different sense
of the word "argument". An argument, in this sense, is a reason for thinking
that a statement, claim or idea is true. For example:
Sally: Abortion is morally wrong because it is wrong to take the life of an
innocent human being, and a fetus is an innocent human being.
In this example Sally has given an argument against the moral permissibility of
abortion. That is, she has given us a reason for thinking that abortion is morally
wrong. The conclusion of the argument is the first four words, "abortion is
morally wrong". But whereas in the first example Sally was simply asserting that
abortion is wrong (and then trying to put down those who support it), in this
example she is offering a reason for why abortion is wrong.
We can (and should) be more precise about our definition of an argument. But
before we can do that, we need to introduce some further terminology that we
will use in our definition. As I've already noted, the conclusion of Sally's
argument is that abortion is morally wrong. But the reason for thinking the
conclusion is true is what we call the premise. So we have two parts of an
argument: the premise and the conclusion. Typically, a conclusion will be
supported by two or more premises. Both premises and conclusions are
statements. A statement is a type of sentence that can be true or false and corresponds to the grammatical category of a "declarative sentence". For
example, the sentence,
The Nile is a river in northeastern Africa
is a statement. Why? Because it makes sense to inquire whether it is true or
false. (In this case, it happens to be true.) But a sentence is still a statement
even if it is false. For example, the sentence,
The Yangtze is a river in Japan
is still a statement; it is just a false statement (the Yangtze River is in China). In
contrast, none of the following sentences are statements:
Please help yourself to more casserole
Don't tell your mother about the surprise
Do you like Vietnamese pho?
The reason that none of these sentences are statements is that it doesn't make
sense to ask whether those sentences are true or false (rather, they are requests
or commands, and questions, respectively).
So, to reiterate: all arguments are composed of premises and conclusions, which
are both types of statements. The premises of the argument provide a reason
for thinking that the conclusion is true. And arguments typically involve more
than one premise. A standard way of capturing the structure of an argument is
by numbering the premises and conclusion. For example, recall Sally's
argument against abortion:
Abortion is morally wrong because it is wrong to take the life of an
innocent human being, and a fetus is an innocent human being.
We could capture the structure of that argument like this:
- It is morally wrong to take the life of an innocent human being
- A fetus is an innocent human being
- Therefore, abortion is morally wrong
By convention, the last numbered statement (also denoted by the "therefore") is
the conclusion and the earlier numbered statements are the premises. This is
what we call putting an argument into standard argument form. We can now
give a more precise definition of an argument. An argument is a set of
statements, some of which (the premises) attempt to provide a reason for
thinking that some other statement (the conclusion) is true. Although arguments
are typically given in order to convince or persuade someone of the conclusion,
the argument itself is independent of one's attempt to use it to convince or
persuade. For example, I have just given you this argument not in an attempt to
convince you that abortion is morally wrong, but as an illustration of what an
argument is. Later on in this chapter and in this book we will learn some
techniques of evaluating arguments, but for now the goal is to learn to identify
an argument, including its premises and conclusion(s). It is important to be able
to identify arguments and understand their structure, whether or not you agree
with conclusion of the argument. In the next section I will provide some
techniques for being able to identify arguments.
Source: Matthew J. Van Cleave
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.