Read this article, which explains interpersonal communication. Consider
the ways in which you can apply this knowledge in your own interactions.
2. Theories
2.4. Relational dialectics theory
The
dialectical approach to interpersonal communication revolves around the
notions of contradiction, change, praxis, and totality, with influences
from Hegel, Marx, and Bakhtin. The dialectical approach searches for
understanding by exploring the tension of opposing arguments. Both
internal and external dialectics function in interpersonal
relationships, including separateness vs. connection, novelty vs.
predictability, and openness vs. closedness.
Relational
dialectics theory deals with how meaning emerges from the interplay of
competing discourses. A discourse is a system of meaning that helps us
to understand the underlying sense of a particular utterance.
Communication between two parties invokes multiple systems of meaning
that are in tension with each other. Relational dialectics theory argues
that these tensions are both inevitable and necessary. The meanings
intended in our conversations may be interpreted, understood, or
misunderstood. In this theory, all discourse, including internal
discourse, has competing properties that relational dialectics theory
aims to analyze.
The three relational dialectics
Relational
dialectics theory assumes three different types of tensions in
relationships: connectedness vs. separateness, certainty vs.
uncertainty, and openness vs. closedness.
Connectedness vs. separateness
Most individuals naturally desire that their interpersonal relationships involve close connections. However, relational dialectics theory argues that no relationship can be enduring unless the individuals involved within it have opportunities to be alone. An excessive reliance on a specific relationship can result in the loss of individual identity.
Certainty vs. uncertainty
Individuals desire a sense of assurance and predictability in their interpersonal relationships. However, they also desire variety, spontaneity and mystery in their relationships. Like repetitive work, relationships that become bland and monotonous are undesirable.
Openness vs. closedness
In
close interpersonal relationships, individuals may feel a pressure to
reveal personal information, as described in social penetration theory.
This pressure may be opposed by a natural desire to retain some level of
personal privacy.