Read this article, which explains interpersonal communication. Consider
the ways in which you can apply this knowledge in your own interactions.
2. Theories
2.6. Social penetration theory
Social
penetration theory is a conceptual framework that describes the
development of interpersonal relationships. This theory refers to the
reciprocity of behaviors between two people who are in the process of
developing a relationship. These behaviors can include verbal/nonverbal
exchange, interpersonal perceptions, and interactions with the
environment. The behaviors vary based on the different levels of
intimacy in the relationship.
"Onion theory"
This theory
is often known as the "onion theory". This analogy suggests that like an
onion, personalities have "layers". The outside layer is what the
public sees, and the core is one's private self. When a relationship
begins to develop, the individuals in the relationship may undergo a
process of self-disclosure, progressing more deeply into the "layers".
Social
penetration theory recognizes five stages: orientation, exploratory
affective exchange, affective exchange, stable exchange, and
de-penetration. Not all of these stages happen in every relationship.
- Orientation stage: strangers exchange only impersonal information and are very cautious in their interactions.
- Exploratory affective stage: communication styles become somewhat more friendly and relaxed.
- Affective exchange: there is a high amount of open communication between individuals. These relationships typically consist of close friends or even romantic or platonic partners.
- Stable exchange: continued open and personal types of interaction.
- De-penetration: when the relationship's costs exceed its benefits there may be a withdrawal of information, ultimately leading to the end of the relationship.
If the early stages take place too quickly, this may be negative for the progress of the relationship.
Example: Jenny and Justin met for the first time at a wedding.
Within minutes Jenny starts to tell Justin about her terrible
ex-boyfriend and the misery he put her through. This is information that
is typically shared at stage three or four, not stage one. Justin finds
this off-putting, reducing the chances of a future relationship.
Social
penetration theory predicts that people decide to risk self-disclosure
based on the costs and rewards of sharing information, which are
affected by factors such as relational outcome, relational stability,
and relational satisfaction.
The depth of penetration is the
degree of intimacy a relationship has accomplished, measured relative to
the stages above. Griffin defines depth as "the degree of disclosure in
a specific area of an individual's life" and breadth as "the range of
areas in an individual's life over which disclosure takes place".
The theory explains the following key observations:
- Peripheral items are exchanged more frequently and sooner than private information;
- Self-disclosure is reciprocal, especially in the early stages of relationship development;
- Penetration is rapid at the start but slows down quickly as the tightly wrapped inner layers are reached;
- De-penetration is a gradual process of layer-by-layer withdrawal.
Computer-mediated social penetration
Online
communication seems to follow a different set of rules. Because much
online communication occurs on an anonymous level, individuals have the
freedom to forego the 'rules' of self disclosure. In on-line
interactions personal information can be disclosed immediately and
without the risk of excessive intimacy. For example, Facebook users post
extensive personal information, pictures, information on hobbies, and
messages. This may be due to the heightened level of perceived control
within the context of the online communication medium.