Organizational Designs and Structures
Types of Organizational Structures
Within
the context of mechanistic versus organic structures, specific types of
organizational structures in the United States historically evolved
over at least three eras, as we discuss here before explaining types of
organizational designs. During the first era, the mid-1800s to the late
1970s, organizations were mechanistic self-contained, top-down pyramids.
Emphasis
was placed on internal organizational processes of taking in raw
materials, transforming those into products, and turning them out to
customers.
Early
organizational structures were focused on internal hierarchical control
and separate functional specializations in order to adapt to external
environments. Structures during this era grouped people into functions
or departments, specified reporting relationships among those people and
departments, and developed systems to coordinate and integrate work
horizontally and vertically. As will be explained, the functional
structure evolved first, followed by the divisional structure and then
the matrix structured.
The
second era started in the 1980s and extended through the mid-1990s.
More-complex environments, markets, and technologies strained
mechanistic organizational structures. Competition from Japan in the
auto industry and complex transactions in the banking, insurance, and
other industries that emphasized customer value, demand and faster
interactions, quality, and results issued the need for more organic
organizational designs and structures.
Communication
and coordination between and among internal organizational units and
external customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders required higher
levels of integration and speed of informational processing. Personal
computers and networks had also entered the scene. In effect, the
so-called "horizontal organization" was born, which emphasized
"reengineering along workflow processes that link organizational
capabilities to customers and suppliers".
Ford,
Xerox Corp., Lexmark, and Eastman Kodak Company are examples of early
adopters of the horizontal organizational design, which, unlike the
top-down pyramid structures in the first era, brought flattened
hierarchical, hybrid structures and cross-functional teams.
The
third era started in the mid-1990s and extends to the present. Several
factors contributed to the rise of this era: the Internet; global
competition - particularly from China and India with low-cost labor;
automation of supply chains; and outsourcing of expertise to speed up
production and delivery of products and services. The so-called silos
and walls of organizations opened up; everything could not be or did not
have to be produced within the confines of an organization, especially
if corporations were cutting costs and outsourcing different functions
of products to save costs. During this period, further extensions of the
horizontal and organic types of structures evolved: the divisional,
matrix, global geographic, modular, team-based, and virtual structures
were created.
In
the following discussion, we identify major types of structures
mentioned above and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Note that in many larger national and international corporations, there
is a mix and match among different structures used. There are also
advantages and disadvantages of each structure. Again, organizational
structures are designed to fit with external environments. Depending on
the type of environments from our earlier discussion in which a company
operates, the structure should facilitate that organization's capability
to achieve its vision, mission, and goals.
Evolution of Organizational Structure
Note the continuum, showing the earliest form of organizational structure, functional, evolving with more complex environments to divisional, matrix, team-based, and then virtual. This evolution, as discussed above, is presented as a continuum from mechanistic to organic structures - moving from more simple, stable environments to complex, changing ones. The six types of organizational structures discussed here include functional, divisional, geographic, matrix, networked/team, and virtual.